Pedestrians highlight crowding concerns

Republish

Republish This Article

Feel free to publish this article on your website. We just ask that you do not edit the article and ensure that the author is correctly attributed! Just copy the code below into your CMS.

By copying the code below you are adhering to all our guidelines

A City of Melbourne-led transport discussion has yielded extensive feedback from Victorians, with pedestrians and public transport users reporting their top experience as feeling overcrowded.

Transport portfolio chair Councillor Nicolas Frances Gilley said an unprecedented number of responses to the Walking, City Space, Public Transport, Cycling, Motor Vehicles, Parking, Emerging Technology and Transport Pricing discussion papers were received.

“With 1300 submissions and 1500 social media comments, this is the most responses we’ve ever had when asking the community to give us their feedback on a topic. We heard from a wide range of postcodes throughout Victoria; including regional areas such as Ballarat,” Cr Frances Gilley said. 

“We have prioritised walking as the most important travel choice in our city, supported by cycling and public transport. Incidentally, these are the three topics that generated the most feedback.

“Residents, workers and visitors to our city are telling us they are feeling overcrowded. Now we have solid data that quantifies that experience and more importantly, suggests how we can tackle it.”

More than half of respondents (54 per cent) to the Walking paper said they had experienced ‘overcrowding on footpaths’. The other top experiences were ‘poor pedestrian etiquette’ (21 per cent) and ‘crossing times at intersections too short/infrequent’ (20 per cent).

The top three unprompted suggestions to combat these issues were: to widen footpaths (27 per cent), create car free zones (24 per cent) and improve traffic light timing (18 per cent).

Of the eight topics tested, cycling received the greatest number of responses (366), with two out of five community members reporting their top experience as ‘unsafe and intimidating’ and suggesting protected bike lanes is the solution.

Like walking, the number one experience of public transport in Melbourne was of ‘feeling overcrowded’ (38 per cent).

The top experiences regarding motor vehicles were ‘motor vehicles block intersections’ (38 per cent), ‘unsafe for pedestrians and cyclists’ (34 per cent) and ‘traffic and congestion’ (23 per cent). 

In suggesting ways to address motor vehicle issues, almost half (47 per cent) of contributors expressed a desire to reduce vehicle access in the CBD.

“While we received overwhelming support for many of the ideas raised in the discussion papers, we also received criticisms and concerns. All feedback will shape the new Transport Strategy we’re releasing early next year,” Cr Frances Gilley said.

“We’re also putting together long-term visions for the Spencer Street, Flinders Street and Elizabeth Street precincts to improve public amenity and access to these important city gateways.”

More than 1300 submissions on eight transport topics were received through the City’s Participate Melbourne website and Participate ideas forum, via mail and email from April to July 2018. A further 1500 social media comments were captured as part of the debate. 

The submissions were in response to eight discussion papers, which presented evidence, best practice from other cities, options and ideas for consideration to encourage community debate and to prompt discussion to inform the City of Melbourne’s draft Transport Strategy.

The draft Transport Strategy is now being completed and will be presented to Future Melbourne Committee in the New Year. Further consultation will follow to finalise the Strategy.

City of Melbourne Manager Media Relations: Bec Brewin
T: 03 9658 8426 | M: 0407 247 673 | E: [email protected]
Visit our Online Media Centre: www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/mediacentre

Lead Image: David Hannah

The latest industry news on your website

Republish Urban content on your website

Republish article
Back to top
Are you a frequent user? Sign in or Register.

Note: Every effort is made to ensure accurate information is provided. If information is out of date, or factually incorrect, please get it touch so we can rectify. Urban accepts no liability and responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient through relying on anything contained or omitted from our publication and platform. Opinions expressed by writers are that of the writer, and may not reflect that of Urban.