Focus on more level crossing removals: Craigieburn Line

Love this article?
Republish this article on your website for free
Republish this article

Republish This Article

Feel free to publish this article on your website. We just ask that you do not edit the article and ensure that the author is correctly attributed! Just copy the code below into your CMS.

By copying the code below you are adhering to all our guidelines

Focus on more level crossing removals: Craigieburn Line

Yesterday the Andrews Government announced it was extending its level crossing removal programme and taking the promise to expand the list of 50 to 75.  The announcement named 14 level crossings and a further 11 would be revealed in due course.

In 2017 the Victorian Auditor-General recommended the development of a 'transparent selection and prioritisation process' for the removal of level crossings beyond the government's commitment of 50.  That framework was published by the Level Crossing Removal Authority (LXRA) on Sunday.

Focus on more level crossing removals: Craigieburn Line
Key principles and underpinning factors used in the prioritisation framework

When the Melbourne Metro Tunnel project is operational and Watergardens-Sunbury services are taken out of the loop and start through-running to Pakenham and Cranbourne, the existing northern loop will receive a capacity boost allowing for more train services to run to both Craigieburn and Upfield.

The Craigieburn line was awarded in 2017 the dubious title of most overcrowded line on the network and is also the main artery for population growth in the inner-to-middle north-west of Melbourne.  Central Moonee Ponds is at the vanguard of increased development activity on the corridor with 21 projects on the database.

Already residents are starting to move into Caydon's former Moonee Ponds market site and the continued completion of new apartments combined with the myriad of other local projects is set to continue to grow central Moonee Ponds' population over the next few years.

Throw in the growing outer north and patronage is likely to climb considerably on the Craigieburn line requiring more services to cater for all the new residents.  

Two level crossings on the Craigieburn line were included in the original list of 50, Buckley Street in Essendon which is now complete, and Glenroy Road in Glenroy which is still at a planning stage.  There are 5 other level crossings still in existence on the Craigieburn line - Macaulay Road in Kensington, Puckle Street/Holmes Road in Moonee Ponds, Park Street in Moonee Ponds, Gaffney Street in Pascoe Vale and Devon Road in Oak Park.

Three of the five remaining crossings have adjacent stations whereas Park Street and Gaffney Street are located away from existing station infrastructure.

As part of the Wider Network Enhancements in the Metro Tunnel project, Essendon station was identified as a point where shorter-run services could originate and terminate to increase frequencies on the Craigieburn line.  The Metro Tunnel Business case identifies Essendon because of its large interchange profile (the Airport West tram and multiple bus routes).

Given the context for increased need (large-scale residential development) and planned (Metro Tunnel Business Case) services on the inner to middle sections of the Craigieburn line, Macaulay Road in Kensington, Puckle Street/Holmes Road in Moonee Ponds are likely to fit the bill with the LXRA's prioritisation process.

The latest industry news on your website

Republish Urban content on your website

Republish this article

Discussion (9 comments)

james espositos's picture
Lets make it clear that the Gaffney street level crossing has Pascoe vale station right next to it.To say that there is only large scale development around the inner to middle sections of the C'burn line is just not correct.The amount of development of townhouses and apartments around Pascoe vale,Oak Parkand Glenroy is causing massive problems in terms of parking and traffic it is a planning disaster here. The Gaffney and Glenroy crossings must go wait times in peak of half an hour are becoming the norm and with more development in the pipeline ie 7 storey proposals at Northumberland road Pascoe vale things are only going to get worse these crossings must get priority
Adam Ford's picture
Puckle Street will be challenging with a heritage station adjacent.
Macaulay they will be lining up with jackhammers to demolish and rebuild in the air, but I think it's shaping as "road under" again for Puckle Street, so queue all the NIMBYs rolling out their template from Buckley Street...
Michael Lyons's picture
Moonee Ponds station is not heritage listed. But how dare those uppity people from Moonee Ponds and Essendon ask for something better for their community than a ditch that reduces traffic and pedestrian connectivity in the local area. Do they think they’re from the southeastern suburbs where complaining about skyrail resulted in Labor doing a backflip and implementing rail under road at Cheltenham? This decision required an additional 25 buildings to be acquired and added 10s of millions to the project cost for acquisitions alone. Did you complain about that as well or is your outrage only for those in the western suburbs seeking a better outcome?
Adam Ford's picture
Don't be RIDICULOUS. You really think I don't know what's in the local heritage scheme? HO248 - it's been listed FOREVER. Try again.
Michael Lyons's picture
Moonee Ponds station is covered by a heritage overlay. Unlike Essendon train station, it is not listed on the Victorian heritage database. Carnegie and Murrumbeena train stations were also covered by heritage overlays and have been demolished.
Nicholas Harrison's picture
Puckle Street is too narrow for a road under solution. I think it will definitely be a rail under .
Adam Ford's picture
What are you going to do with the adjacent heritage station then? You're going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on a new underground station?
Michael Lyons's picture
Maybe they could repurpose it for community use just like they will be doing to Mentone train station. Mentone is a heritage listed station and the LXRA are doing rail under road there and will be building a new station. By the way Moonee Ponds station is not heritage listed.
Nicholas Harrison's picture
The heritage station buildings are only on the eastern side of the railway line so the station could be in a trench and the western side of the existing station building which could be incorporated into the new station at ground level.
Back to top
Note: Every effort is made to ensure accurate information is provided. If information is out of date, or factually incorrect, please get it touch so we can rectify. Urban accepts no liability and responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient through relying on anything contained or omitted from our publication and platform. Opinions expressed by writers are that of the writer, and may not reflect that of Urban.
Are you a frequent user? Sign in or Register.