Bayswater next in line to see level crossing removals

Republish

Republish This Article

Feel free to publish this article on your website. We just ask that you do not edit the article and ensure that the author is correctly attributed! Just copy the code below into your CMS.

By copying the code below you are adhering to all our guidelines

It was announced this morning that the level crossings either side of Bayswater station at Scoresby Road and Mountain Highway are next in line to go.

In a noticeable shift from previously unveiled grade separation and station designs, the method chosen to grade separate will involve partially lowering the rail line and partially raising Mountain Highway. A full rail under road grade removal will occur at Scoresby Road.

Kevin Devlin, the CEO of the Level Crossing Removal authority explained this option was chosen in order to allow for the continuing use of the rail yards and maintenance depot which currently sits alongside Bayswater station. The maintenance depot is accessed from the main line at a junction right next to the Mountain Highway level crossing and this will be rebuilt at a lower grade as part of the overall works.

An alliance consisting of Laing O'Rourke, Fulton Hogan and Aecom have been confirmed as the preferred bidder with the cost of the entire project coming in at $177 million.

Bayswater station is currently an island platform with an underground pedestrian ramp providing passenger access in to the bus bay and car park. The new station will see an island platform accessed via an entry brought closer to Station Street with an overhead ramp, stairs and lift depositing passengers on the new platform sitting at a lower grade.

The Ringwood corridor and Belgrave branch are inching ever closer to being fully grade separated; when after all the announced projects have been completed only Union Road in Surrey Hills, Mont Albert Road near Mont Albert Station, Bedford Road in Ringwood, Alpine Street in Ferntree Gully and Hilltop Road in Upper Ferntree gully will remain as a level crossing.

Level Crossings that still exist on the Lilydale branch include Dublin Road in Ringwood East, Coolstore Road in Croydon, Manchester Road in Mooroolbark, Melba Avenue in Lilydale and Maroondah Highway at the terminus of the Lilydale line.

Manchester Road and Maroondah Highway are on the Victorian Government's list of 50 but have no news about their status has been announced as yet. Union Road and Mont Albert Road in Surrey Hills-Mont Albert are not on the list.

Bayswater to join the Box Hill, Blackburn and Ringwood party?

It will be an interesting exercise to monitor planning activity in the region given City of Knox have done extensive planning to focus development around the station precinct and the urban growth boundary is limiting any further suburban growth beyond the area (not to mention Mount Dandenong is a natural barrier for further fringe-belt growth).

The powers that be effectively locked the eastern suburbs of Melbourne away from further sprawling down the Yarra Valley into Yarra Glen and Healesville and up into the hills decades ago and the new housing stock in the entire region is a story of new medium and high density development at the major nodes on the Ringwood corridor. It makes sense that Bayswater should join them.

The latest industry news on your website

Republish Urban content on your website

Republish article

4 comments

Aussie Steve's picture

It would be ideal to see the open air car park as proposed, to be covered by high density development on top either as office or residential or a mix of both, with retail at ground level facing the main street.

Nicholas Harrison's picture

In 2005 City of Knox introduced the Bayswater structure plan to reinvigorate this run down, unattractive suburban centre. But it included a 2-5 storey recommended height limits, even over the acres of surface car parking around the train station.

Can you guess how much development has occurred in Bayswater over the past ten years as a result of the structure plan?

Looks like the state government is not interested in incorporating any urban regeneration projects in conjunction with the crossing removal beyond the new stations and more surface car parking which is a massive wasted opportunity.

Marcio Wilges's picture

I for one, would love to see more amenities built nearby with all these upgrading going on. I mean if you are going to rebuild a transport hub, why not a shopping centre and such too. It's a good way to increase business and economy to the area once office removals have the companies moved into the area to utilise the new transport facilities.

Marcio Wilges

Steve Raider's picture

Nevermind.

<You can only edit posts not delete them?>

Back to top
Are you a frequent user? Sign in or Register.

Note: Every effort is made to ensure accurate information is provided. If information is out of date, or factually incorrect, please get it touch so we can rectify. Urban accepts no liability and responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient through relying on anything contained or omitted from our publication and platform. Opinions expressed by writers are that of the writer, and may not reflect that of Urban.