Valuations

<html><body>
The economic impacts from COVID-19 on valuing, owning, managing and administering commercial real estate will be profound, according to a paper released by Property Funds Association.
In conjunction with property valuation firm, Preston Rowe Paterson, The PFA/PRP issues paper Dealing with Valuation Uncertainty – Investment Real Estate serves as a guide to stakeholders in the asset revaluation process during the COVID-19 crisis, raising potential issues among the accounting and valuation standards.
Paul Healy, CEO of Property Funds Association (PFA), said valuation challenges will be felt across the property industry. “It is almost certain that lenders, regulators and auditors will heighten the scrutiny of investment real estate valuations.
“As an industry we are all in this together and it’s important we defer to the recognised accounting and valuation standards."
“These fair valuation standards weren’t all available during the global financial crisis and will help property to navigate the COVID-19 crisis. It’s important we have some uniformity around valuation, which will benefit all in the property investment industry”, he said.
According to the paper, key challenges to accurate property valuations include the speed of COVID-19’s impact on the economy, lack of comparable property data, and the impact from newly introduced legislation including the Commonwealth’s Commercial Leasing Code.
The paper says: “Given the speed with which we have entered into the economic impact of Covid 19… it is likely that there will be a period of time where the market is starved of sale and lease transactions struck after the announcement of the pandemic on 2 March 2020 which would ordinarily allow the direct comparison methodology to apply.”
It also says the Commonwealth’s Commercial Leasing Code (the Code): “…will have a sudden and profound impact on investment real estate cash flows for the period of the Covid 19 pandemic and, as espoused in the Code, a reasonable recovery period, which will in turn impact the underlying value of the asset based on pre COVID 19 cash flows.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Property faces valuation uncertainty in the wake of Covid-19

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
CoreLogic announces the appointment of Shelley Horton as the new general manager of valuation solutions Australasia. Shelley will bring a new perspective to CoreLogic valuation partners as they navigate an evolving landscape of digital disruption and business transformation.
Shelley started her career as a registered property valuer, has held leadership roles at Genworth, and consulted on valuations operations and strategy to major CoreLogic banking clients. She has unparalleled experience across the real estate, valuation, banking and finance and mortgage insurance industries.
In her new role, Shelley will oversee all aspects of CoreLogic’s valuation solutions, including the panel management function, with the goal of further growing the leadership footprint in Australia and New Zealand by supporting valuation firms to address their day-to-day challenges. One of her main purposes will be to help the valuation industry in its goals to grow, manage risks, and optimise operational performance for our shared clients.
Shelley Horton said, “The valuation industry plays a key role supporting many important sectors of the economy and I am excited about partnering with the industry as it continues to evolve in the information age and to help drive innovation, efficiencies and sound risk management solutions that embrace the use of data, analytics and technology.”
In closing, CoreLogic General Manager, Industry Solutions James Vaughan said, “This is the start of an exciting new era for CoreLogic. We are really looking forward to embark on a journey with our valuation partners and empower them to fulfil their goals. Shelley has a great track record in working in complex multi stakeholder environments and driving outcomes through the power of innovation, data and collaboration.”
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Shelley Horton appointed as general manager of valuation solutions Australasia: CoreLogic

<html><body>
Valuations are at the heart of property investment – particularly when it comes to getting finance, or being refinanced, with a lender.
You might also just be asking ‘<a href="/news/27120-how-much-is-my-home-worth-judging-a-propertys-value" target="_blank">What is my home worth?</a>’ and a valuation may appear to be the natural way to answer this question.
<blockquote>
MUST KNOW ELEMENTS:
IT'S NOT AN APPRAISAL
THEY'RE NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE
THERE ARE MULTIPLE TYPES OF VALUATION
COMPARABLES ARE HEAVILY RELIED UPON
YOU CAN ASSIST THE VALUER 
</blockquote>
There are also many reasons why you’d want to get an independent valuation – observer<a href="/expert-insights/investing/21919-five-great-reasons-to-get-an-independent-valuation-cameron-mcevoy" target="_blank"> Cameron McEvoy aptly describes five crucial reasons you’d consider this</a> - and so it pays to be aware of what is involved.
Here are five ‘must know’ elements of valuations:
1) It’s not an appraisal
You may have had an appraisal with a real estate agent, and now believe that your home can fetch in excess of $630,000 on the current market. This may be the case, however a real estate agent’s appraisal is not a valuation, and will not be accepted by the bank as such.
While most real estate agents act with professionalism, investors must be aware that it’s not unheard of for real estate agents to alter the appraisal they provide you to match your expectations, and to be fairly bullish with their appraisals to secure a listing.
A valuer, however, is immune to these pressures, tasked with one job and one job alone – valuing your home.
2) They’re not an exact science
It will be of no surprise to any savvy investor that figuring out the price of a property is never an exact science, even for those trained in the valuation field. Similarly, obtaining two different valuations also isn’t an unheard of occurrence, and is the reason many investors will head to a different bank to obtain financing, particularly after a renovation.
Observer <a href="/expert-insights/investing/24155-wednesday-july-3-upper-right-mark-armstrong" target="_blank">Mark Armstrong refers to bank valuations as being ‘murky waters’</a>. “Remember if a valuation comes in too high and the bank loses money on the loan then the valuer maybe legally liable,” he notes, which may suggest why there is also a general impression in real estate that valuers are conservative with their estimates.
Similarly, it has been pointed out time and time again, such as <a href="/expert-insights/investing/13600-home-valuations-can-be-subjective-" target="_blank">by Mal James in this article</a>, that valuers are subjective. This is because they are human beings, and they act with the information provided and their knowledge to come up with the best possible response.
3) There are multiple types of valuation
While we’re focusing on a fairly rigorous in-person valuation, there are a number of different types of valuations. From the DIY desktop valuation (which have <a href="/expert-insights/investing/16329-diy-website-property-valuations-mostly-askew" target="_blank">varying results of accuracy</a>), to the ‘kerbside’ drive by valuation, be aware that not all are created equal.
RP Data lists four different types of valuation that you'll want to understand:
<ol>
<li>Full valuation</li>
<li>Short form or pro forma valuation</li>
<li>Restricted valuation (to include “restricted assessment”, “kerbside” and “drive by” valuations)</li>
<li>Desktop (to include electronic valuer review - EVR)</li>
</ol>
4) Comparables are heavily relied upon
One of the major aspects that valuers look at to come up with a final figure is that of 'comparables'. That is, recent sales in your area that are close to your property in location and type. A valuer will be required to judge whether your property is superior or inferior to these sales, and so adjust their valuation accordingly. If you want to get an idea of how the valuation may stack up, it'd be worth finding out the latest sales that they will be looking at. This also means that for properties in remote areas, or unique style homes, it will be trickier for the valuer to come up with a figure and, therefore, more subjective and down to interpretation.
5) You can assist the valuer 
As with any property, present it with its best foot forward for the best change of securing a good valuation. While valuers do not want to be harassed, told how to do their jobs or provided information that could sway them against the numbers, you can be helpful and provide information about improvements undertaken since purchase.
Be on site, ready to ask and answer questions, and have all the information about your property on hand.
Despite the reasons to get a valuation, there’s always the other side of the argument. If you’re considering a valuation, you may also want to hear <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/expert-insights/investing/19324-tuesday-upper-right-terry-ryder" target="_blank">Terry Ryder’s thoughts on why valuations are a “waste of time and money”</a>. Late last year, Property Observer also covered a <a href="%20http:/www.propertyobserver.com.au/financing/26422-valuation-industry-needs-overhaul" target="_blank">heated debate that asked for an ‘overhaul’ of the valuations industry</a>.
Tips for those wanting to get the best from a valuer:
<ul>
<li>Provide them a list of comparable sales (potentially inside the same project, as well as some that are not). While not all valuers will use them, some will. 
</li>
<li>Apply for finance six months before completion, not six days and if you find the valuation comes in low it gives you time to get a third and a fourth. 
</li>
<li>Attain your own valuation, using a valuer that is on your bank's panel of valuers. 
</li>
<li>Ask to see a soft valuation so you can check the comparables used and the comments made. 
</li>
<li>Bear in mind that the valuer often has a different valuation for mortgage purposes as opposed to sale purposes. But mainly: 
</li>
<li>Do your research beforehand.  Go out and look at 100 or even 10 before you make a purchase decision. If you've done your research you should be confident it will value up.</li>
</ul>
Source: CPM Realty
FURTHER USEFUL READING 
<a href="/expert-insights/finance/15169-property-valuations-get-them-right" target="_blank">How to get property valuations right</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/15397-property-valuation-101" target="_blank">Property valuation 101</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/26499-letters-to-the-editor-valuation-experiences" target="_blank">Letters to the editor: Valuation experiences</a>
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Valuations: Five must know facts

<html><body>
One quarter of Australian home owners either over or underestimate the value of their property by more than 20%, a study conducted recently by the Reserve Bank of Australia has found.
On average, home owners appeared to have a good idea of the value of their properties, with half of people estimating the price of their home to within 11% of the actual average market value for their area, the study, <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2014/pdf/rdp2014-04.pdf" target="_blank">Home Price Beliefs in Australia</a>, conducted by Callan Windsor, Gianni La Cava and James Hansen in the RBA’s economic research department, found.
However, the study noted the average results were partly due to offsetting numbers of home owners who overvalued and undervalued their properties.
“At any point in time, some postcodes have self-assessed valuations that appear high relative to market-inferred prices while some postcodes have valuations that appear low relative to market-inferred prices, on average,” the report noted.
Home owners in Sydney and Brisbane tended to overvalue their properties on average, while Melbourne home owners on average undervalued their properties.
Factors such as the owners’ age, the length of time they had lived in their home, and local area characteristics such as regional unemployment rates had the potential to bias the owners’ views on the value of their property, the study showed.
In general, older home owners were more prone to overvaluing their property.
People who had lived in their home for longer were less likely to be overly optimistic about the value of their property, which the study put down to the owners’ knowledge of the market and experience.
People who lived in areas of high unemployment tended to undervalue their homes.
The study also found that home owners who overvalued their property spent more and were more highly leveraged than people who had a more realistic view of their home’s value. Home owners who undervalued their properties spent less and carried lower levels of debt.
The authors said the findings showed beliefs about home values affected household financial decisions.
</body></html>

zfielding-GvX3Uq9KTa

Think you know how much your home is worth? Research suggests a lot of Aussies are well off the mark

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
This article is a response to Property Observer article “<a href="/expert-insights/34689-how-independent-is-a-property-valuer" target="_blank">How independent are property valuers?</a>” 
Q: How independent is a property valuer?
A: Very.
Propell prides itself not only their level of independence but also their commitment to quality. Propell valuers are all registered with the API and have received certified qualifications, and as rightly pointed out by Edwin Almeida in his Property Observer article 'How independent is a property valuer', valuers undergo years of university-level training to complete the jobs they do.
Propell’s well document quality management process is regularly communicated to clients, and updated to reflect changes in the market and property industry in general.
Time pressures are a reality in any professional services environment, however our valuers continuous commitment to quality is paramount.
Our staff are governed by the Australian and New Zealand valuation and property standards, as set out by the Australian Property Institute and these include strict guidelines in relation to independence, ethics, honesty and professional competency. The maintenance of these standards are not a matter of opinion, they are a professional requirement.
Propell valuers are accredited and experienced in the valuation industry and all work to ensure internal quality assurance and compliance to API standards. As stated by the API: “Following accreditation, CPVs continue to update their knowledge with regular professional development courses within the API. And this means that rather than dealing solely with statistics or relying on ‘gut feeling’, CPVs have a hands-on, professional approach and work with well-established processes and standards to produce valuations that are robust, reliable and independent.”
Our sophisticated valuer support department means our teams of valuers are backed up by a comprehensive and highly effective support model, allowing the maximum amount of time between appointments, always ensuring valuers have adequate time to appropriately assess the property in question and provide an accurate valuation figure.
We encourage owners to prepare information and do their homework when preparing for their property to be valued. The process of valuing a property is not at all simple, and the more information our teams have access to, the better. Our independent and internal research department also equips our teams with the most up-to-date and property intelligence, market information and factors affecting the areas, ensuring valuation figures are not only independent, but are sound, reflect the market but also comply with all standards as set out by the Australia Property Institute.
Bart Mead is CEO of <a href="https://www.propell.com.au/" target="_blank">Propell</a>. 
Mark Nassif is COO of <a href="https://www.propell.com.au/" target="_blank">Propell</a>.
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Property valuations aren't an opinion, they are a professional standard

<html><body>
When looking to buy a property, the one thing that concerns every purchaser is how much the property is really worth.
As one of the most expensive purchases of lives, it’s understandable to be concerned about overpaying.
However, determining “market value” is trickier than it sounds. While it is effectively true that "market value" is whatever the market will pay for the property when it sells, this advice doesn’t do new buyers, or even experienced buyers, any favours when they’re working out what they should prudently offer or bid for a home.
The methods to work out what you should pay are varied and some of them require a lot of time and effort.
Heading to the suburb’s median price may be on many a person’s “top” thing to do to get an idea of value in a suburb. However, this is fraught with difficulty. Here are <a href="forward-planning/29338-four-things-to-know-about-median-prices" target="_blank">four things you should know about median price first</a>, before deciding to use this as a way to determine value (it’s not).
With median prices ruled out, what are we left with?
Buyer’s agent Patrick Bright says that it is through comparative market analysis that buyers will work out the best price to pay. That is, looking at other properties on the market or hose that have recently sold and using this to get a gauge for what this property should sell for. This isn’t a bad technique.
He suggests that 100 comparable homes are inspected. Quite an undertaking.
“When I started in real estate as a selling agent I didn't really have a clue what homes in the area were worth. The owner of the real estate office said to me, 'Patrick, you need to learn what the market value is of homes in the area. I want you to go out and see as many properties as you can in the next few weeks'. He told me I had to inspect each home and document all its relevant features,” writes Bright.
“I decided that I was going to inspect 100 properties and so I pretended to be a home buyer for about four weeks. I covered four or five suburbs, looked at a little over 100 properties and took notes on each one. I wrote down the asking price and what I thought they were worth and followed them up after they'd been sold,” he explained.
He attended a lot of auctions as well, and by the end of the month he was fairly confident about what the market was doing and what properties were worth.
He says this is some of the best advice he has ever received and <a href="/expert-insights/investing/20033-spare-book-observer-patrick-bright" target="_blank">while it’s a lot of work, it’s worthwhile</a>.
Meanwhile, Michael Matusik points to rental returns as a key factor in determining value, particularly for investment properties. He says that they should really be used as the benchmark.
“And the 5% gross rental return – the old school marker which essentially converts to $1 in weekly rent for every $1,000 spent buying a property – is still the most accurate measure, in my opinion, to help determine investment value,” he <a href="forward-planning/34184-how-to-determine-fair-investment-value" target="_blank">writes in his explanation</a>.
Technology is increasingly looking to make our property research easier. The new app RealAs looks to present predictions of what the properties are worth, and notes that they do so with a high degree of accuracy – factoring in features like what is on the market and comparable aspects.
Sadly, the algorithm is a closely guarded secret and is not available for everyone to play around with – but it <a href="/news/34375-can-this-algorithm-determine-what-a-bad-property-is" target="_blank">does allow you to plug in any property that’s on the market right now and see their estimate</a>.
Then there’s the option to pay for a professional valuation. There are four types:
<ol>
<li>Full valuation 
</li>
<li>Short form or pro forma valuation 
</li>
<li>Restricted valuation (to include “restricted assessment”, “kerbside” and “drive by” valuations) 
</li>
<li>Desktop (to include electronic valuer review - EVR)</li>
</ol>
Source: RP Data
If you want to know the differences between these valuations, and how each of them is calculated, you can <a href="/news/27120-how-much-is-my-home-worth-judging-a-propertys-value" target="_blank">read our in-depth explanation here</a>.
See over page for the things you must know about valuations.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
A valuation may appear to be the natural way to answer this question of what your property is worth, so let's take a closer look.
<blockquote>
MUST KNOW ELEMENTS:
<ul>
<li>It's not an appraisal</li>
<li>They're not an exact science</li>
<li>There are multiple types of valuation</li>
<li>Comparables are heavily relied upon</li>
<li>You can assist the valuer</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
There are also many reasons why you’d want to get an independent valuation – observer<a href="/expert-insights/investing/21919-five-great-reasons-to-get-an-independent-valuation-cameron-mcevoy" target="_blank"> Cameron McEvoy aptly describes five crucial reasons you’d consider this</a> - and so it pays to be aware of what is involved.
Here are five ‘must know’ elements of valuations:
<img src="/images/2014/07/04/yellow-one.jpg" alt="" style="float: left;">It’s not an appraisal
You may have had an appraisal with a real estate agent and now believe that your home can fetch in excess of $630,000 on the current market. This may be the case, however a real estate agent’s appraisal is not a valuation and will not be accepted by the bank as such.
While most real estate agents act with professionalism, investors must be aware that it’s not unheard of for real estate agents to alter the appraisal they provide you to match your expectations and to be fairly bullish with their appraisals to secure a listing.
A valuer, however, is immune to these pressures, tasked with one job and one job alone – valuing your home.
<img src="/images/2014/07/04/yellow-two.jpg" alt="" style="float: left;">They’re not an exact science
It will be of no surprise to any savvy investor that figuring out the price of a property is never an exact science, even for those trained in the valuation field. Similarly, obtaining two different valuations also isn’t an unheard of occurrence and is the reason many investors will head to a different bank to obtain financing, particularly after a renovation.
Observer <a href="/expert-insights/investing/24155-wednesday-july-3-upper-right-mark-armstrong" target="_blank">Mark Armstrong refers to bank valuations as being ‘murky waters’</a>. “Remember if a valuation comes in too high and the bank loses money on the loan then the valuer maybe legally liable,” he notes, which may suggest why there is also a general impression in real estate that valuers are conservative with their estimates.
Similarly, it has been pointed out time and time again, such as <a href="/expert-insights/investing/13600-home-valuations-can-be-subjective-" target="_blank">by Mal James in this article</a>, that valuers are subjective. This is because they are human beings, and they act with the information provided and their knowledge to come up with the best possible response.
<img src="/images/2014/07/04/yellow-three.jpg" alt="" style="float: left;">There are multiple types of valuation
While we’re focusing on a fairly rigorous in-person valuation, there are a number of different types of valuations. From the DIY desktop valuation (which have <a href="/expert-insights/investing/16329-diy-website-property-valuations-mostly-askew" target="_blank">varying results of accuracy</a>), to the ‘kerbside’ drive by valuation, be aware that not all are created equal.
RP Data lists four different types of valuation that you'll want to understand:
<ul>
<li>Full valuation</li>
<li>Short form or pro forma valuation</li>
<li>Restricted valuation (to include “restricted assessment”, “kerbside” and “drive by” valuations)</li>
<li>Desktop (to include electronic valuer review - EVR)</li>
</ul>
<img src="/images/2014/07/04/yellow-four.jpg" alt="" style="float: left;">Comparables are heavily relied upon
One of the major aspects that valuers look at to come up with a final figure is that of 'comparables'. That is, recent sales in your area that are close to your property in location and type. A valuer will be required to judge whether your property is superior or inferior to these sales, and so adjust their valuation accordingly.
If you want to get an idea of how the valuation may stack up, it'd be worth finding out the latest sales that they will be looking at. This also means that for properties in remote areas, or unique style homes, it will be trickier for the valuer to come up with a figure and, therefore, more subjective and down to interpretation.
<img src="/images/2014/07/04/yellow-five.jpg" alt="" style="float: left;">You can assist the valuer 
As with any property, present it with its best foot forward for the best change of securing a good valuation. While valuers do not want to be harassed, told how to do their jobs or provided information that could sway them against the numbers, you can be helpful and provide information about improvements undertaken since purchase.
Be on site, ready to ask and answer questions, and have all the information about your property on hand.
Despite the reasons to get a valuation, there’s always the other side of the argument. If you’re considering a valuation, you may also want to hear <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/expert-insights/investing/19324-tuesday-upper-right-terry-ryder" target="_blank">Terry Ryder’s thoughts on why valuations are a “waste of time and money”</a>. Late last year, Property Observer also covered a <a href="%20http:/www.propertyobserver.com.au/financing/26422-valuation-industry-needs-overhaul" target="_blank">heated debate that asked for an ‘overhaul’ of the valuations industry</a>.
Tips for those wanting to get the best from a valuer:
<ul>
<li>Provide them a list of comparable sales (potentially inside the same project, as well as some that are not). While not all valuers will use them, some will. 
</li>
<li>Apply for finance six months before completion, not six days and if you find the valuation comes in low it gives you time to get a third and a fourth. 
</li>
<li>Attain your own valuation, using a valuer that is on your bank's panel of valuers. 
</li>
<li>Ask to see a soft valuation so you can check the comparables used and the comments made. 
</li>
<li>Bear in mind that the valuer often has a different valuation for mortgage purposes as opposed to sale purposes. But mainly: 
</li>
<li>Do your research beforehand.  Go out and look at 100 or even 10 before you make a purchase decision. If you've done your research you should be confident it will value up.</li>
</ul>
Source: CPM Realty
FURTHER USEFUL READING 
<a href="/expert-insights/finance/15169-property-valuations-get-them-right" target="_blank">How to get property valuations right</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/15397-property-valuation-101" target="_blank">Property valuation 101</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/26499-letters-to-the-editor-valuation-experiences" target="_blank">Letters to the editor: Valuation experiences</a>
</body></html>

How to: Determine market value so you don’t overpay

<html><body>
What is a property worth and who determines the end value? Odds on, it’s the valuer.
To most property investors, the phrase “a property is worth what someone is willing to pay and what the vendor is willing to accept” would hold true. This premise does not necessarily hold true with the banks funding the purchase, the agents and particularly the valuer.
How can so many industries hold vastly different opinions over the value of a property?
The Funding Banks Position
Over many years I have attended hundreds of bank valuations for settlement purposes and valuation inspections for re-financing purposes. As a novice I expected identical results. However, experience taught me that the same property may be valued for different purposes and the figures can be 10%-15% apart.
Sometimes one valuer will have a very different opinion to another valuer. Even worse, I have had the same valuer place different values on identical properties only a few weeks apart. Both were the same in style, configuration, position, block and level. How could this be so?
I soon learned it was due to the loan to value ratio (LVR). The funder simply wants to hedge their financial position and loan. It makes sense, the higher the LVR the lower the valuation. Different banks adopt different policies and therefore some are more lenient than others. The rule of thumb for a valuer is, as instructed by the banks, to value at a price point that could be achieved if the property was to be taken to an urgently orchestrated auction.
How is it that lenders settle on what is considered to be an overpriced property? As you dig deeper, the loans requested are typically at low LVRs, usually less than 70% of the sales value of the property. If the bank valuation does come in low however, the buyers are comfortable to tip in the balance. Most overseas investors do not walk away from a settlement as a local buyer would.
The alternative in today’s market is to hedge the loan with lenders mortgage insurance (LMI). Even if the banks do accept a lenient valuation and provide a high LVR, they are protected. The buyer however pays a high price to protect not themselves but the banks interest. This may be seen as typical in a hot property market like we are in now.
The valuer’s role
The role of the valuer is to provide fair and market value of a property. A simple request, but not a simple exercise.
The valuation is performed by an individual that has spent years obtaining a university degree to competently provide a report. However, market conditions and banking requirements negate the proper process of what would otherwise be a textbook valuation.  
Here are some of the difficulties and insights I have been able to hear firsthand from valuers over the years:
<ul>
<li>Time pressures to perform a well-structured inspection. Typically a valuer will only spend on average five to 10 minutes at the property. More time is spent travelling from one appointment to the next.</li>
<li>Pressures to adhere to individual banking requirements, as opposed to market forces.</li>
<li>Pressures of funders paying less, when valuers face greater costs to run a business and provide a service. Increasing costs of personal indemnity insurance and staffing overheads are some of their concerns.</li>
</ul>
So given these hurdles, how can the valuers do their job in the right manner? The valuation process may constitute measuring the property inside and out properly, ascertaining the value of the construction of the dwelling, working out depreciation of fixtures and fittings, the depreciation of dwelling ratio to appreciation of land ratio, rental returns and most recent sales in the area of like properties and how they compare in all aspects.
Not a lot of time is allocated or adequate reward given by the funder to do a proper assessment. Therefore the valuers rely on the local agents for recent sales data and other forms of online tools/websites. Most importantly, the valuers are reliant on the contract of sale (the front page outlining sale price and special conditions).
Special conditions may note any vendor guarantees such as rents, gifted cars or other incentives. The valuer can also work out from the contract as to who sold it to gauge commissions paid out.
For a valuation of a refinanced property, the valuers are also relying on the documentation which outlines the revaluation amount sought by the owner. Information passed on to the bank by the mortgage broker and by the bank to the valuer.
This article continues on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
How independent is the valuation under the stated conditions?
I will throw my hat in the ring and say, not very independent at all. Allow me to raise the following concerns and you can assess for yourself if the valuations are as independent, accurate and as transparent as we would like to believe they are.
<ul>
<li>The bank orders the valuation and pays for the valuation.</li>
<li>The valuers understand who “the hand that feeds them” is. Therefore, are they persuaded by the policies put in place by the lenders, or will they genuinely adopt a totally arm’s length approach?</li>
<li>How can valuers make well educated assessments of the property when such little time is spent at the property due to time constraints?</li>
<li>How in-depth are the valuation reports and how much data is imported to create the report when the rewards are so small in comparison to time spent?</li>
</ul>
 If you believe the above is entirely a speculation on my part, made from purely a cynical point of view, then one should ask the following question: Why do valuers ask for and need the front page of the contract before writing out their report?
It is a question that underpins my belief that valuers are simply not paid well enough, nor given sufficient time to conduct and produce proper valuation reports. Valuers have become short change researches and quick photo takers, which rely purely on instant data to satisfy their client: the banks.
But not all is lost, as I do take my hat off to the valuers that take time to research the market, have an understanding of construction and keep up with market conditions and trends.  Not dissimilar to the good real estate agents that shine in the high markets as well as in the low turning markets.
So here are my four tips to achieve the most in a property valuation:
<ul>
<li>Prepare the property for a valuation as you would for an open house.</li>
<li>Don’t send the valuer to a tenanted property without being accompanied by the agent. The agent should be equipped with research data to promote desired outcome.</li>
<li>Do as much homework as you can for the valuer and have the print outs of like properties that will give you the desired outcome, even if it’s for a re-finance situation.</li>
<li>Always accommodate the valuer with time and don’t make them wait.</li>
</ul>
If you believe the above is true and you have had similar circumstances as those described, I would like to read your comments.
EDWIN ALMEIDA is managing partner and licensee-in-charge of <a href="https://www.just-think.com.au/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Just Think Real Estate</a>.
Propell's Bart Mead and Mark Nassif have responded to this article in a piece you can read <a href="/expert-insights/34709-property-valuations-aren-t-just-an-opinion-they-are-a-professional-standard" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

ealmedia-arK4DBYLjS

How independent is a property valuer?

<html><body>
The two Sydney municipal districts experiencing the highest annual increases in median residential land values were Willoughby (up 37% to $1.08 million) and Bankstown (29.4% up to $519,000).
Their increases were more than double the overall 13 percent statewide residential increase, thereby possibly tipping further investors into the land tax web which applies to investment property with a value above the revised $432,000 threshold.
The NSW State Government threshold applies to the combined investment property portfolio of individual investors, businesses and SMSFs, excluding principal place of residence. 
Highlighting the Sydney property price momentum, Hornsby (up 25.3% to $554,000), The Hills Shire (24.4% to $504,000), Canterbury (21.4% to $438,000), Marrickville (19.9%), Warringah (19%) and Manly (18.6%), the electorate of the State Premier, Mike Baird, also had above average increases. Leichhardt was up 17.4 per cent.
Overall residential land values for NSW increased by 13 per cent in the 12 months to 1 July 2014, compared to a 3.2 per cent increase for the year to 1 July 2013.
The escalation follows several years of relatively flat valuations.
The valuation surge has pushed a further four Sydney local government areas (LGAs) into the $1 million plus category for median residential land value.
Waverley, Hunters Hill, Willoughby and Manly have joined Mosman and Woollahra.
The pricey eastern suburbs regained the crown from the lower north shore as Woollahra overtook Mosman, becoming the LGA with the highest median residential land value of $1.4 million (a 13.8% increase from 2013). 
With the slowest growth among Sydney metropolitan LGAs of 6.9 per cent, Mosman median land value stands at $1.39 million, but still someway ahead of Waverley ($1.12m), Hunters Hill ($1.09m), Willoughby ($1.08m) and Manly ($1.05). North Sydney and Lane Cove just fall short of the million dollar median value.
North Sydney and Ryde were the only other LGAs that recorded growth of less than 10 per cent (9.6% and 9.2% respectively). 
No metropolitan LGAs recorded negative growth. 
The biggest overall market trend has seen increases for land values predominantly occur in the Sydney basin. 
The major non-metropolitan centres showing the highest residential median land values were Newcastle ($255,000) and Wollongong ($248,000).
Newcastle recorded the greatest growth in median residential land values over the 12 month period at 10.4 per cent, followed by Wyong with growth of 9.1 per cent. 
A number of regional LGAs performed strongly including Gilgandra (an increase of 30%), Coonamble (20%), Oberon (20%), Dubbo (19.4%), Newcastle (10.4%), Bathurst Regional (9.6%), Wyong (9.6%) and Kiama (9.5%).
LGAs close to Canberra had the highest median land values of inland centres, with Queanbeyan ($266,000) the highest followed by Yass Valley ($172,000). 
A total of 22 LGAs in the state experienced a decrease in median residential land values for the 12-month period, with the largest decrease experienced in Cobar ($23,200) with the median residential land value dropping by 10 per cent. Five other inland LGAs experienced negative growth of five per cent or more in median residential land values, Broken Hill ($17,600), Tumut ($66,500), Guyra ($53,400), Moree Plains ($36,900) and Griffith ($79,500).
There was no change at other lgas including the Eurobodalla median land value of $155,000 and Shoalhaven’s $158,000.
The value of all land in NSW has increased by more than 11 per cent, exceeding $1.12 trillion, in the 12 months to 1 July 2014, according to new figures released by NSW Valuer General, Simon Gilkes, who replaced Philip Western, who endeavoured to make a start at ridding the system of its many flaws during his 11 year term. Simon Gilkes, the deputy General Manager and Director, Valuation Services, Land and Property Information, is the acting Valuer General. 
As part of the 1 July 2014 valuation program, the LPI Department assessed almost 2.5 million residential, rural, business and industrial land values for properties in NSW across the 152 lgas.
Valuers analysed over 43,000 property sales across NSW to determine the 1 July 2014 land values; with specific property sales the most important factor considered when determining fresh land values.
Every year approximately one third of Local Government Areas (LGA) receive new valuations to assist with setting rates. Ku-ring-gai, the Hills and Leichhardt will use the updated data when setting rates in 2015.
Some 882,000 Notices of Valuations are being sent to landholders in 45 LGAs this month, showing the value of properties based on market conditions as at July 1, 2014.
The 45 councils will review their rates model for this year based on the new land values.
Land values are one of the factors councils will use set each landholder’s rates.
“Increases or decreases in land values do not necessarily lead to similar increases or decreases in rates.” Mr Gilkes said.
The land values were prepared by valuers contracted from 17 firms across the state. 
“The values are then subject to rigorous quality assurance including statistical testing by the University of Western Sydney,” he said. 
“For 1 July 2014 residential land values in more than 94 per cent of LGAs met or exceeded internationally recognised measures of consistency and accuracy. 
“We are also improving our information to the community and making it easier for landholders to raise concerns and understand how their issues are being addressed.” 
Landholders concerned about their Notice of Valuation can have it independently reviewed by lodging an objection.
About 0.1 per cent of Notices of Valuation required amendment following the 2013 valuations. 
However the NSW Parliament's last two inquiries into the valuation system found the existing processes associated with land valuation objections, valuations for just terms purposes and related objection processes remained "unfair and inadequate." 
Landholders have 60 days to request a review of any land value on the Land Tax Assessment from the date it was issued. Land tax clients cannot object to their average land value.
Objections must be based on individual land values that appear on the land tax assessment. Land tax clients may object to all three years' land values, upon the receipt of their land tax assessment.
Land value is the value of the land only, and does not include improvements such as the houuse or other structures. But it thereby nabs investors with houses on land more so than investors with units in apartment blocks. For strata units, the land value for each individual strata lot is calculated on a proportional basis using the unit entitlement for each lot and the aggregate for the strata scheme. 
<a href="https://www.apps08.osr.nsw.gov.au/erevenue/calculators/landtax.php#anc_calc" target="_blank">Land tax is $100 plus 1.6 per cent of the land value of investment properties above the $432,000 threshold</a>, which jumped from $412,000 in the past year.
Land tax is applied to the value of any property owned or jointly owned that is above the land tax threshold as at midnight on December 31. A landholder with one or more parcels of taxable land (such as investment properties, holiday houses or commercial premises), may be liable for land tax if the total value of land exceeds the land tax threshold.
Values are determined as at 1 July, preceding each land tax year. 
The latest 2014 valuations are being posted online over the next month, with the Valuer General allowing NSW property owners to conduct five <a href="https://www.valuergeneral.nsw.gov.au/your_land_value/land_value_search" target="_blank">free online valuation searches</a> following <a href="https://shop.lpi.nsw.gov.au/wps/portal/lpma/lpi-shop/land-values/register/!ut/p/b1/04_SjzQyMDAwNDI2NzDWj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfGjzOKDnZxCTR0NzQwNzJ1dDDwNzfxMnEMNvVw9zfWDU_P0c6McFQF2_pit/" target="_blank">registration</a>.
Hardly sufficient as since 2007 and subsequent tax years, the value used to determine land tax liability is the average of the land value for the current tax year and the land values for the previous two years, each of which is available one at a time.
News Ltd papers estimated the average land tax bill in the City of Sydney will increase from $2212 in 2014 to $3,300 this year.
It estimates the land tax bill for the investor owner of an average plot of land in Willoughby will rise from about $6000 in 2014 to around $10,000 this year. 
 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Willoughby, Bankstown and Hornsby property investors face higher land tax bills

<html><body>
The global real estate services company JLL has bought the valuation business, Propell National Valuers.
The deal sees Propell's 200 staff from every state and territory added to JLL's 2300-strong workforce.
JLL Australia chief executive Stephen Conry said the acquisition had been made carefully within the heated residential market. 
Propell completes about 100,000 residential valuations per year.
It has been reported JLL's reputed $25 million acquisition will give it clout in the residential segment, taking on valuation companies such as Herron Todd White, which does more than 300,000 valuations per year, CBRE and Opteon Property Group. 
JLL has doubled revenue from its valuations business in the last five years.
Propell chief executive Bart Mead will continue his senior leadership role at JLL Australia.
Propell’s Head office is in Brisbane.
The business in Australia will continue to operate as Propell – a JLL company during an initial transition and integration phase.
Picture above is of Propell CEO, Bart Mead, (left), with JLL Australia CEO, Stephen Conry.
</body></html>

JLL buys Propell National Valuers

<html><body>
All but two of Melbourne’s 31 metropolitan councils are increasing rates next financial year by an average of 2.25 per cent, according to the Herald Sun.
Monash wants to bust the cap, pushing for a 3.53 per cent rise in rates unless it can introduce a new waste charge to deal with the recycling crisis.
China's ban on some recycling imports, including those from Australia, is behind the desire.
Victoria previously exported the majority of its recycling to China, where it was processed and used to fuel factories.
Major recycling companies including Visy, SKM and Polytrade would pay councils about $60 to $70 a tonne for the contents of residents' yellow bins and sell it to China at a higher price.
Now unable to do that, it is understood recycling companies plan to charge councils about $60 a tonne to take the material.
The Glen Waverley-based Monash council is one of a few that doesn’t currently have a separate rubbish levy.
The usual annual rate rise is mandated to be a maximum of 2.25 per cent, but waste charges are excluded from that cap.
Nillumbik will increase rates by an average of only 1.95 per cent. Mayor Peter Clarke, who froze rates last year, has been a long-time critic of council budgeting practices.
Several councils are also increasing their waste levies in the wake of the China recycling crisis. Bayside is proposing a 40 per cent, or $92.75 rise, to $324.55.
The paper suggests thousands of Victorian households will be hit with bigger-than-expected rate rises when notices go out next month.
Despite the state government cap of an average 2.25 per cent, high property revaluations will push up rates for many families above that limit, with estimated annual increases of up to $100 likely.
In the City of Melbourne, 57 per cent of ratepayers will pay more than the cap, with households in East Melbourne and Kensington hit hardest because of rising property values.
CBD and Docklands residents can expect their bills to be level with the cap or below, Deputy Lord Mayor Arron Wood said.
Ratepayers Victoria wants independent financial monitors to check on councils’ finances and the rates they charge.
Spokesman Frank Sullivan told The Herald Sun rate increases should not be automatic and the monitors would see if ratepayers’ money was used wisely.
In Stonnington, chief exec­utive Warren Roberts confirmed that almost one in three homes would receive a general rate rise above 2.25 per cent.
“The average residential rate increase is approximately $31 for the year, or 60 cents per week,’’ he said.
In Port Phillip, mayor Bernadene Voss said 28 per cent of ratepayers would receive an above-cap bill.
In Hume, in Melbourne’s outer north, about two-thirds would pay more.
In the outer-eastern Yarra Ranges, 58 per cent will pay above the cap, while in Hobsons Bay the figure is 68 per cent.
</body></html>

Valuations

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Valuations

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News