Reserve Bank

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Less than half an hour after the Reserve Bank of Australia cut the official cash rate to the new low of 1.5 percent, some of the nation’s lenders announced their interest rate movements. 
I am disappointed to see some lenders choose shareholder profits over customer outcomes. 
The RBA’s decision to cut the cash rate in August didn’t come as a surprise. 
Against a backdrop of historically low inflation, softening employment and an Australian dollar stubbornly determined to stay above $0.75 USD, it was only a matter of time before we saw the RBA cut the cash rate.
That said, at a time when the economy could do with the lift that a cut to the cash rate would provide, it was deeply disappointing to hear some of the nation’s largest and most profitable lending institutions announce that only 10 or 13 of the 25 basis point reduction would be passed on to their mortgage customers. 
It would be very easy to let this partial rate cut pass under a veil of rhetoric around the cost of wholesale funds, and requirements to hold increased amounts of capital against mortgages.
The reality is however, if all lending institutions chose an equally profit focused approach and held back this proportion of the 25 basis point cut, then this equates to something like $2 billion dollars taken out of the pockets of Australian mortgage holders and placed onto the bottom line of institutions that are already generating tens of billions of dollars in profits every year. 
It is also disappointing to see that whilst some lenders are quick in announcing these partial rate reductions, it takes them a little longer to implement these cuts at all - it can sometimes be weeks and/or months. 
There is no reason why a lending institution cannot pass on rate reductions to their customers as soon as they are announced. By choosing to delay their approved rate cuts, these lenders are further adding to their swelling bottom lines at the expense of their customers. 
Interestingly, while lenders take weeks to pass on any rate cuts to their home loan customers, I wonder how long it takes for the same institutions to reduce the amount of interest they will pay on savings and transaction accounts.
There is still a high degree of market volatility. Unemployment has edged slightly higher over the last month, consumer confidence is down, and housing affordability remains a critical issue for many.
Knowing this, I would like to see more of our lenders act in the interests of their customers.
John Flavell is chief executive officer <a href="https://www.mortgagechoice.com.au/" target="_blank">Mortgage Choice</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Are Australia's banks being greedy?

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/57114/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
For economists and others who ‘grew up’ being challenged to achieve low and stable inflation against the background of high and volatile inflation rates that emerged in Western countries in the 1970s (and persisted in Australia through the 1980s), the possibility inflation could be ‘too low’ can seem like something from another universe.
The Reserve Bank of Australia’s 2-3% inflation target was more-or-less unilaterally promulgated by Bernie Fraser (who was RBA Governor from 1989 until 2006).
In a speech just after the 1993 election (at which the Liberal Opposition had advocated the introduction of a 0-2 percent inflation target, similar to that which had been adopted in New Zealand in 1989), Fraser suggested that:
“If the rate of inflation in underlying terms could be held to an average of 2-3 percent over a period of years, that would be a good outcome. Such a rate would be unlikely to materially affect business and consumer decisions, and it would avoid the unnecessary costs entailed in pursuing a lower rate.”
Although Bernie Fraser was initially “rather wary of inflation targets”, he explicitly couched the series of interest rate hikes he implemented during the second half of 1994 as being undertaken in order to maintain inflation within the 2-3 percent range.
The target was formally embodied in a Statement on the Conduct of Monetary Policy agreed between newly-installed Treasurer Peter Costello and newly-appointed RBA Governor Ian Macfarlane shortly after the 1996 election, and has been re-iterated after each change of government and upon each appointment of a new RBA Governor ever since.
Australia’s approach to inflation targeting differs from that of most other countries which have inflation targets in two important respects. First, it does not stem from a government directive, nor is it enshrined in legislation. As former Governor Ian Macfarlane has said, “the government didn’t introduce it, we introduced it”.
The Reserve Bank does not have to “explain itself” to politicians if it “misses” its target for some reason. Second, the target is intentionally and explicitly flexible. It is expressed as a range, to be achieved “on average” and “over the course of the business cycle” (a term which is not anywhere defined), rather than at all times and in all places, as it were.
This means that the Reserve Bank can “tolerate” inflation being either above or below the target for a temporary period if it has good reason to believe that the deviation is only temporary, or is the result of some one-off factor whose influence will soon pass, without needing to take monetary policy actions to push it back into the target range more quickly but which would, in the RBA’s judgement, not otherwise be necessary.
This “flexible inflation targeting regime” has served Australia well over the past two-and-a-bit decades. The target is widely perceived to be “credible” – that is, it is widely recognised and understood that the Reserve Bank will do what it needs to do in order to ensure that it is achieved (as it demonstrated, for example, in 1994 and in 2007).
As a result, it has served to “anchor” inflationary expectations – that is, to give participants in the economy (businesses, consumers, union officials, governments and others) a sound basis for expecting that inflation will average somewhere between 2 and 3% over the medium-to-longer term – as it was intended to do.
And it has allowed the RBA to keep interest rates more stable than would have been the case if it had been required to chase after inflation on each and every occasion on which it temporarily departed from the target range.
With the annual “headline” rate of inflation having been below the bottom end of the 2-3% target range since the December quarter of 2014, and more recently the annual “underlying” inflation rate also having dropped below 2 percent, some have suggested that the inflation target should itself be lowered.
This would allow the central bank more room to accommodate unusually low inflation without having to cut rates to levels which might risk triggering unsustainable rates of credit growth and/or an asset price bubble.
Ironically, the opposite proposition was put during the resources boom of 2010-12, when some suggested that the RBA should increase its inflation target so as not to have to raise interest rates as much in the face of the inflationary pressures which it was feared that boom might engender.
The RBA resisted such calls on that occasion, and should do so on this. As it is formulated, the RBA’s flexible inflation target gives it latitude to determine how dogmatic it needs to be in pursuit of “low and stable” inflation.
If it were to change its target every time it appeared as though inflation might be either above or below the target range for an extended period, the target would eventually lose whatever role it has as an “anchor” for inflation expectations, increasing the chance that inflation would – as a result of the well-documented propensity of inflation expectations to become self-fulfilling – remain above or below the target for even longer, and perhaps by even wider margins.
Australia’s inflation targeting regime has served the country well, and the challenges it faces at this time are not so great as to warrant altering it.
Saul Eslake is Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow, University of Tasmania and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/saul-eslake-665" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Why the Reserve Bank should resist calls to alter its inflation range: Saul Eslake

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The Reserve Bank has maintained its “neutral stance” – meaning that rate hikes are as likely as rate cuts in the period ahead.
In practice though no change in rates is likely.
What does it all mean?
The Reserve Bank Board is comfortably on the interest rate sidelines. Much would need to go wrong at home and/or abroad for the Reserve Bank to cut rates again. At the same time, rate hikes are off the agenda. In essence policymakers are giving households and business more time to work with record low interest rates, and forget about rate movement and get on with spending, hiring and investing.
There are signs that the economy is lifting from its early 2017 malaise. Retail activity is lifting, unemployment is at 4-year lows, job vacancies are at 61⁄2-year highs and importantly record home building and a large pipeline of infrastructure spending will support the economy over 2017.
The key is how business investment plans evolve over the coming year. And most of the indicators suggest that the future outlook is encouraging. Corporate Australia is being supported by strong business conditions, upbeat confidence, high capacity use, and healthy profits – all conducive to a lift in hiring and investment over the coming year.  
No surprises there are still a couple of ‘hot button’ issues to monitor at present: home prices; household debt levels, subdued wage growth and the Aussie dollar. And while policymakers remain upbeat about the medium term prospects for the economy there is a clear understanding that “consumption growth remains subdued” largely due to “slow growth in real wages and high levels of household debt”. 
Importantly the RBA reiterated its view that while the “growth in housing debt has outpaced the slow growth in household incomes. The recent supervisory measures should help address the risks associated with high and rising levels of household indebtedness”.
Perspectives on interest rates 
The Reserve Bank has left the cash rate at 1.50 per cent. The previous move was a rate cut in August 2016 (25 basis points). There have now been 12 rate cuts since November 2011, with the Reserve Bank cutting rates from 4.75 per cent to 1.50 per cent. 
The Reserve Bank had previously lifted rates seven times from October 2009 to November 2010 – a total of 1.75 percentage points, from 3.00 per cent to 4.75 per cent. 
What are the implications of today’s decision? 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/07/05/Screen%20Shot%202017-07-05%20at%208.07.08%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/07/05/Screen%20Shot%202017-07-05%20at%208.07.08%20AM.png" alt="">
 
There is no urgency for rates to move in any direction. On the positive side of the ledger are record corporate profits; strong business conditions; a lift in infrastructure spending; firm home building; and the prospect of further job growth.
On the other side of the ledger, wage and price growth is low; consumer spending is fluky; home price growth is slowing; and the Aussie dollar remains firm.
The Reserve Bank is expected to maintain its neutral policy stance for an extended period.We expect the Reserve Bank to stay on the interest rate sidelines for the 2017 year.
Savanth Sebastian is an economist for <a href="https://www.commsec.com.au/">CommSec</a> 
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column"> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

Reserve Bank alert but not alarmed

Booms, busts, cycles and risk appetite: RBA's Luci Ellis

<html><body>
<div class="row">
<div class="meta">GUEST OBSERVER</div>
</div>
<div class="body">
The Reserve Bank of Australia announced it will hold the official cash rate in September at the historically low rate of 1.50 percent.
The decline of rates throughout 2016 may be partly attributed to the stubborn Australian dollar, which hovered around US$0.76 for most of July and August. The RBA have used subtle language and interest rate cuts in an attempt to de-value the Australian currency over the year.
A lower Australian dollar increases competitiveness of Australian goods. It also increases general prices through imported inflation, lifting the price of imported inputs for Australian goods and services. The annual inflation rate of just 1% to June in Australia looks set to remain low, at least over the remainder of the year.  
Despite the best efforts of the RBA, the AUD continued to climb gradually since May, which partially contributed to the August cut. The persistently high AUD made a case for further rate cuts.
That was, until, Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen spoke at a symposium on the 26th of August.
Yellen argued that strengthening in the US labour force meant “the case for an increase in the federal funds rate has strengthened in recent months”. The speech was followed by comments from the Vice Chair Stanley Fischer, who indicated that US rates could rise as soon as September.
This hint at higher interest rates saw a boost to the USD, and a complementary weakening in the AUD. Graph 1 shows the movement of the AUD relative to the USD over August. This took pressure off the RBA to use monetary policy as a means to lower the dollar, and may have contributed to the hold decision this month.
Graph 1: AUD/USD-August 2016
<a href="/images/2016/09/08/Screen%20Shot%202016-09-09%20at%208.50.40%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/09/08/Screen%20Shot%202016-09-09%20at%208.50.40%20AM.png" alt="">
Source: RBA &amp; Trading Economics
The next Fed rate decision is September 22nd, and an increase is likely to place further downwards pressure on the AUD and potentially create room for the RBA to delay further rate cuts.
This is important, because residential property value growth and dwelling approvals in Sydney and Melbourne have continued to be reactive to rate cuts earlier this year. Across Australia, dwelling construction saw a 1.2% increase over the June quarter, and a strong 6% increase over the year. Meanwhile, other sectors of construction work fell dramatically: engineering work fell by 9% in the quarter, and private construction fell by 14% over the period. 
Building approvals were up across Australia in July, as the number of units approved increased 4.97% year on year. However, across the country the number of separate houses approved fell by 3.19%. Much of the growth in dwelling approvals for the year was driven by the Sydney and Melbourne markets. This was expected following a May rate cut as more dwelling development projects gain cost benefit. A hold in rates is likely to see the market steady.  
Graph 2: Trend Data - Residential Dwelling Approvals Australia Wide
<a href="/images/2016/09/08/Screen%20Shot%202016-09-09%20at%208.49.29%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/09/08/Screen%20Shot%202016-09-09%20at%208.49.29%20AM.png" alt="">
Source: RBA &amp; Onthehouse.com.au
Graph 3: Trend Data - Total Residential Dwelling Approvals by Capital City
<a href="/images/2016/09/08/Screen%20Shot%202016-09-09%20at%208.48.09%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/09/08/Screen%20Shot%202016-09-09%20at%208.48.09%20AM.png" alt="">
Source: RBA &amp; Onthehouse.com.au
The number of dwelling approvals across Australia over time is shown in Graph 2. While 2012-15 saw a steep increase in the number of dwelling approvals, another small upward trend can be seen over 2016. Graph 3 shows the original monthly data of total dwelling approvals by capital city (which is volatile relative to the trend data), with Sydney and Melbourne experiencing a significant surge.
The movements in dwelling approval data is expected, as it follows capital growth in the dwelling market. Following the May rate cut, Residex observed strong growth in Sydney and Melbourne dwellings for the June quarter, including a 1.85 percent surge in Sydney units, and 2.29 percent in Melbourne units.
The RBA faces a two-tiered economy in which housing has boosted growth in the south-east coast of Australia, while growth in other cities across Australia is subdued. Part time employment in Australia also reached a record high of 31.63 percent in July, suggesting ongoing structural challenges in full time job creation and wage growth. As the rate is held for September, we may expect these east coast markets to steady a little, and growth in approvals start to flatten.
Eliza Owen is market analyst for Onthehouse.com.au and can be contacted <a href="https://www.onthehouse.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
 
</div>
</body></html>

The RBA faces a two-tiered economy: Eliza Owen

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
GUEST OBSERVER
The ANZ/Roy Morgan consumer confidence rating rose by 0.3 percent to a 7-week high of 118.2 in the week to November 13.
Confidence remains above the average of 113.0 since 2014.
The minutes from the November 1 Board meeting shows that the Reserve Bank has become more alert to inflation risks. 
The consumer confidence figures have implications for finance providers, retailers, and companies dependent on consumer and business spending. The Reserve Bank Board minutes provides guidance on interest rate settings. 
What does it all mean?
Aussie consumers are unfazed by the US election result. Consumer confidence edged to 7-week highs in the latest week, no doubt boosted by strong gains on the Australian sharemarket late in the week. Interestingly respondents believe that the economic outlook over the medium term has improved.
There is a clear change in the Reserve Bank’s attitude to inflation. The latest Board minutes highlight the recent lift in commodity prices as well as perceptions that economic growth for advanced nations could exceed “potential growth”. As such the Reserve Bank concludes that “risks to the global inflation outlook were more balanced than they had been for some time.” Similarly Board members believe that Australian underlying inflation is “expected to return to more normal levels over time.”
Admittedly the Reserve Bank isn’t flashing warning signs on growth and inflation. But it should also be noted that in the period since the Reserve Bank Board meeting there has been the election of a new US President with growth-focussed economic policies. Metal and mining prices and bond yields have soared.
<a href="/images/2016/11/15/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-15%20at%2012.51.52%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/15/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-15%20at%2012.51.52%20PM.png" alt="">
Simply interest rate settings are likely to remain stable until well into 2017.
What do the figures show?
Consumer confidence
The ANZ/Roy Morgan consumer confidence rating rose by 0.3 percent to 118.2 in the week to November 13.
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Confidence is up 2.0 percent over the year and above the average of 113.0 since 2014. 
Two of five components of the index rose in the latest week.
<ul>
<li> The estimate of family finances compared with a year ago was down from +11 to +10; </li>
<li> The estimate of family finances over the next year was down from +28 to +27;</li>
<li> Economic conditions over the next 12 months was up from +5 to+6;</li>
<li> Economic conditions over the next 5 years was up from +10 to +13;</li>
</ul>
The measure of whether it was a good time to buy a major household item was steady at +35. In addition the inflation expectation 2 years ahead rose from 3.8 percent to 3.9 percent.
Reserve Bank Board minutes:
“Members noted that assessing conditions in the housing market had become more complicated. While overall conditions had eased relative to 2015, some indicators had strengthened over the previous few months. In particular, housing price growth had picked up noticeably in Sydney and Melbourne. However, housing turnover and growth in housing credit both remained lower than a year earlier, consistent with the supervisory measures that had been taken to tighten lending standards and the more cautious attitude to lending in certain segments. In addition, a considerable supply of apartments is scheduled to come on stream over the next few years, particularly in the eastern capital cities, and growth in rents in the September quarter was the slowest for some decades.”
“Considerable uncertainty remained about the strength of labour market conditions and the implications for labour cost growth.”
 “Members observed that some indicators of domestic inflation cost pressures, such as growth in the wage price index, had stabilised, albeit at low levels, and that underlying inflation was expected to return to more normal levels over time. The overall assessment was that the risks around the inflation forecast were broadly balanced.”
</div>
<div class="column">“Higher commodity prices and expectations that growth in the major advanced economies would exceed potential growth suggested that the risks to the global inflation outlook were more balanced than they had been for some time.”</div>
<div class="column"> </div>
<div class="column">“Members commenced their discussion of the domestic economy by considering how outcomes over recent years had differed from earlier forecasts, noting that the differences for key variables, including inflation, the unemployment rate and GDP growth, had been modest by historical standards.”</div>
<div class="column"> </div>
<div class="column">“Members noted that there was significant uncertainty about the outlook for consumption growth given uncertainty about households' expectations of their income growth and the influence of these expectations on their spending and saving decisions. This was particularly pronounced for households with significant debt.”</div>
<div class="column"> </div>
<div class="column">What is the importance of the economic data?</div>
<div class="column"> </div>
<div class="column">The ANZ/Roy Morgan weekly survey of consumer confidence closely tracks the monthly Westpac/Melbourne Institute consumer sentiment index but the former measure is a timelier assessment of consumer attitudes and is now closely tracked by the Reserve Bank. The Reserve Bank releases minutes of its monthly Board meeting a fortnight after the event. The minutes give a guide to Reserve Bank thinking on interest rate settings.
What are the implications for interest rates and investors?
CommSec expects the Reserve Bank to remain on the interest rate sidelines for an extended period.</div>
<div class="column"> </div>
<div class="column">Could the next move in interest rates be a rate hike rather than a rate cut? It’s important not to get too far ahead of ourselves. Inflation is still historically low. And while there is speculation of growth-focussed policies in the US, they haven’t been fleshed out. However you get a sense that inflation has reached an inflexion point. </div>
<div class="column"> </div>
<div class="column">Craig James is the chief economist at <a href="https://www.comsec.com.au/default.aspx" target="_blank">CommSec</a>.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Happy Aussies, Reserve Bank on inflation watch: CommSec's Craig James

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
GUEST OBSERVER
Australia has a new “two-speed” economy that comprises: (i) NSW and Victoria (driven largely by Sydney and Melbourne); and (ii) the rest of Australia.
The size and relative strength of the NSW and Victorian economies means that economic data presented at the national level is masking weakness throughout the rest of Australia.
Economic activity in NSW and Victoria, along with strong dwelling price growth in Sydney and Melbourne, is likely to see the RBA sit on the sidelines. But the rest of Australia could probably do with more policy easing. 
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.22.22%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.22.22%20AM.png" alt="">
During the mining investment boom it was fashionable to talk about Australia’s “two- speed” economy. Surging commodity prices drove a spectacular lift in activity in the resources sector that sent the WA, QLD and NT economies into full blown growth mode.
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.23.31%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.23.31%20AM.png" alt="">
Meanwhile, relatively high interest rates (compared to other advanced economies) and a strong AUD weighed heavily on the rest of Australia. As such, the term “two-speed” was coined to characterise the Australian economy. 
Fast forward some six years and Australia yet again finds itself with a “two-speed” economy. But this time it’s NSW and Victoria that are driving demand and employment growth while the rest of Australia is feeling the pinch (chart 1). In fact, it’s largely Sydney and Melbourne propping up national outcomes.
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.24.46%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.24.46%20AM.png" alt="">
Capacity utilisation is high in Australia’s two largest cities and demand growth is strong, courtesy of incredibly low interest rates. As a result, the NSW and Victorian economies have performed much better than the rest of Australia. 
The big influence that NSW and Victoria have on the national figures means that pretty soft conditions throughout the rest of Australia have flown under the radar. In fact, economic outcomes in most regions of Australia are probably weaker than the national figures are suggesting unless you’re in Sydney or Melbourne. There are some exceptions, notably the ACT, but the generalisation holds for most places. 
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.25.47%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.25.47%20AM.png" alt="">
In this note we look at how the Australian economy is faring on the new “two-speed” basis. We slice the economy into two pieces – (i) NSW &amp; Victoria (termed VicNSW); and (ii) the rest of Australia (termed ROA). For dwelling prices that are published on a capital city basis we split the data between Sydney &amp; Melbourne (SydMel) and the remaining capital cities (ROA). Basically we are trying gauge how the rest of the Australian economy is going when you strip out NSW and Victoria (or Sydney and Melbourne). Of course, it can be argued that if you exclude the strongest parts then all you are left with is the weakest bits. But that is precisely the point. We want to better understand how the rest of the Australian economy is going outside of NSW and Victoria. 
The numbers – setting the scene.
To understand what we are analysing it makes sense to briefly look at the size of our two pieces. By Gross State Product (GSP), which is effectively output, NSW is worth 32% of the national pie and Victoria 221⁄2%. So our VicNSW economy is worth 541⁄2% of the national economy which leaves the ROA comprising 451⁄2% (chart 2). By population, NSW has 32% of Australia’s residents and Victoria clocks in at 25%. This leaves 43% of people residing in the ROA. By capital city, 64% of people who live in NSW are in Sydney and 75% of Victoria’s residents are in Melbourne. For the ROA, 62% of people are in the capital cities (chart 3). So our VicNSW and ROA split 
Population growth
We kick off with population growth because it heavily influences aggregate growth rates like output and employment. The latest figures show that in the year to QI 2016, population growth in VicNSW was running at 1.6% while it was growing at 1.1% for the ROA (charts 4 and 5). This is a material difference. It largely reflects two forces (i) interstate migration, in particular from WA and SA to Victoria due to a lack of job opportunities; and (ii) a significant proportion of overseas migrants settling in either Sydney or Melbourne.
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.26.53%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.26.53%20AM.png" alt="">
We need to keep the population growth rates of VicNSW and ROA in mind when looking at the economic data because the ROA is at a “handicap” of about 0.5%pa. Put another way, if the ROA is clocking in at 0.5%pa less than VicNSW for growth rates then performance per capita is effectively the same. We consider this to be important because differing population growth rates can give a misleading impression of economic performance. And per capita measures are a better barometer for gauging changes in living standards (see here). As our analysis shows, even accounting for the 0.5%pa difference in population growth, VicNSW is performing far better than the ROA. 
State Final Demand
State Final Demand (SFD) is basically the sum of household and government expenditure and investment. It does not include exports and is therefore a better measure of demand (i.e. the total value of goods and services that are sold domestically) than GSP which includes exports.
The data shows that demand growth has been strong in VicNSW while it has been contracting throughout the ROA since mid-2014 (chart 6). The decline in SFD throughout the ROA reflects falling business investment and weak consumption growth. SFD has been hit particularly hard in the mining regions of WA, QLD and NT where investment in the resources sector has fallen sharply (chart 7). SFD growth has been tepid in SA and Tas leaving the ACT as the only bright spot. All up, demand growth in the ROA is consistent with very soft economies.
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.27.49%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.27.49%20AM.png" alt="">
Strong demand growth in VicNSW has been assisted by the positive wealth effect from rising dwelling prices. Higher asset prices have supported household consumption growth and dwelling investment in Australia’s two largest states. These two economies did not experience a downturn in mining investment and were able to benefit from both the fall in interest rates and the AUD. 
Employment growth
There is plenty of evidence of our new “two-speed” economy in the labour market data. Jobs growth has slowed nationally. But the slowdown in jobs growth for the ROA has been sharp. In fact, there has been a contraction in the level of employment for the ROA through the year to October (chart 8). The number of people working in the ROA has fallen by 40k over the past year. The reality is that jobs growth in Australia has been driven by NSW and Victoria over the past year. For the ROA, the labour market is incredibly weak. In some states, conditions in the labour market are commensurate with a recession, particularly WA (chart 9). 
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.28.56%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.28.56%20AM.png" alt="">
Unemployment rate
The national unemployment rate has been trending down over the past year thanks to a decline in participation. But when we look at the economy through our “two- speed” lens it becomes apparent that the unemployment rate for the ROA has been stuck above 6% for two years (chart 10). It has basically trended sideways since mid-2015 while the unemployment rate has been falling in VicNSW. A disappointing story for the ROA which reflects a decline in the level of employment offset by a fall in participation. 
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.30.13%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.30.13%20AM.png" alt="">
Of course new jobs have been “created” in the jurisdictions that comprise ROA. But there have also been a lot of job losses, primarily in the mining and manufacturing sectors. To be fair to our Territories, the unemployment rate is low in the ACT and NT. But it’s well above the level associated with full employment (considered to be around 5%) in QLD, SA, WA and Tasmania (chart 11).
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.31.13%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.31.13%20AM.png" alt="">
In our view, the jobless rate for the ROA is likely to sit a touch above 6.0% over the next six months. It will continue to be a different story in VicNSW and we see the unemployment rate holding at around 51⁄4%. A big lift in public investment in NSW should keep the unemployment rate anchored around 5%. 
It’s worth noting here that the unemployment rate is not proving as useful as usual to determine the amount of slack in the labour market. That’s because underemployment has bene rising while the unemployment rate has been falling due to the casualisation of the workforce (see here). As a result, wages growth has been easing.  
Business investment 
Investment in VicNSW has trended up recently because of a lift in capex in NSW. But for the ROA business investment is down 17.2% through the year to QII 2016 (chart 12). The big decline has been driven by a huge fall in spending in QLD and WA because of the downturn in mining capex. There has also been a decline in capex in SA, Tas, and NT. For the ROA, only the ACT has posted a lift in business investment. This is a pretty poor result considering the stimulus that has come through from lower interest rates and a lower AUD. It should be a concern to policymakers.
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.32.13%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.32.13%20AM.png" alt="">
We expect business investment to continue to decline in the ROA as resource related projects are completed. The pace of the downturn, however, will start to slow as the worst of the downturn in mining capex is now behind us. The outlook for the non- mining part of the economy remains mixed. Our forecasts have non-mining capex lifting a little over 2016/17 which should see VicNSW post a further modest lift in business investment. 
Dwelling Prices
National dwelling prices have risen substantially over the past 31⁄2 years. But the data shows that the lift in dwelling prices has largely been a Sydney and Melbourne story (chart 13). Demand for housing has been strong in Australia’s two largest cities, driven by a variety of factors which include: (i) interest rate cuts; (ii) a high level of investor demand; (ii) foreign investment; (iii) strong population growth; and (iv) some supply issues (particularly in Sydney).
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.33.24%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.33.24%20AM.png" alt="">
For the ROA, however, dwelling price growth has been much more modest. In fact, dwelling prices have been falling for a few years in Perth (chart 14). Price rises in most of the other capital cities have been significantly lower than those in Sydney in Melbourne.
Commentators often make the mistake of generalising about dwelling prices in Australia and assume that the housing market is homogeneous. But the data shows that there is a significant divergence between price growth across Australia’s capital cities. 
Building approvals
Strong dwelling price growth in Sydney and Melbourne has translated into a big lift in building approvals, particularly for apartments. For the ROA, however, building approvals have eased. On a rolling annual total basis dwelling approvals are down 7.1%pa for the ROA (chart 15). There is a bit of a multispeed story for approvals in the ROA. There has been a big fall in approvals in WA as vacancy rates rise and dwelling prices fall. Approvals in QLD have actually been quite strong and a big lift in apartment supply will hit the Brisbane market over the next few years. But when we look at the ROA as a collective, dwelling investment will cool. For VicNSW, however, there is still a lot of residential construction in the pipeline. The supply response is welcome given the big lift in dwelling prices. 
<a href="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.35.04%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/22/Screen%20Shot%202016-11-22%20at%2010.35.04%20AM.png" alt="">
Are there implications for monetary policy?
The RBA has recently shifted from an implied easing bias to a neutral tone. And market pricing for a rate cut has receded (chart 16). We think the RBA’s reluctance to ease policy further is generally related to the strength of the NSW and Victorian economies, in particular the exceptionally strong housing markets of Sydney and 
Melbourne, and the lift in commodity prices. But the economic data suggests that the ROA could do with more policy easing.
Last week’s wages and employment data were weak. Normally, softness in the labour market and below-target inflation would imply that policy easing is forthcoming. A lower cash rate would, among other things, push the AUD down which would boost activity in Australia’s tradables sector. But clearly the RBA has a degree of discomfort at the strength of dwelling price growth in Sydney and Melbourne that has taken a near term rate cut off the table.
The lesson here is that the new “two-speed” economy means that current monetary policy settings are likely to be suboptimal for the ROA outside of Sydney and Melbourne. If the Sydney and Melbourne property markets stall or falter then policy easing will probably come back onto the agenda because the ROA could do with more stimulus. Of course that stimulus could also come via fiscal policy as we have previously argued (see here). But that’s a conversation for another day. 
Gareth Aird is economist at Commonwealth Bank and can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://au.linkedin.com/pub/gareth-aird/14/790/905" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Our new two-speed economy – how does it look? CBA's Gareth Aird

<html><body>
<h1 class="page-title">Statement by Philip Lowe, Governor: Monetary Policy Decision</h1>
At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 1.50 per cent.
Conditions in the global economy have continued to improve over recent months. Business and consumer confidence have both picked up. Above-trend growth is expected in a number of advanced economies, although uncertainties remain. In China, growth is being supported by higher spending on infrastructure and property construction. This composition of growth and the rapid increase in borrowing mean that the medium-term risks to Chinese growth remain. The improvement in the global economy has contributed to higher commodity prices, which are providing a significant boost to Australia's national income.
Headline inflation rates have moved higher in most countries, partly reflecting the higher commodity prices. Long-term bond yields are higher than last year, although in a historical context they remain low. Interest rates are expected to increase further in the United States and there is no longer an expectation of additional monetary easing in other major economies. Financial markets have been functioning effectively and stock markets have mostly risen.
The Australian economy is continuing its transition following the end of the mining investment boom, expanding by around 2½ per cent in 2016. Exports have risen strongly and non-mining business investment has risen over the past year. Most measures of business and consumer confidence are at, or above, average. Consumption growth was stronger towards the end of the year, although growth in household income remains low.
The outlook continues to be supported by the low level of interest rates. Financial institutions remain in a good position to lend. The depreciation of the exchange rate since 2013 has also assisted the economy in its transition following the mining investment boom. An appreciating exchange rate would complicate this adjustment.
Labour market indicators continue to be mixed and there is considerable variation in employment outcomes across the country. The unemployment rate has been steady at around 5¾ per cent over the past year, with employment growth concentrated in part-time jobs. The forward-looking indicators point to continued expansion in employment over the period ahead.
Inflation remains quite low. With growth in labour costs remaining subdued, underlying inflation is likely to stay low for some time. Headline inflation is expected to pick up over the course of 2017 to be above 2 per cent, with the rise in underlying inflation expected to be a bit more gradual.
Conditions in the housing market vary considerably around the country. In some markets, conditions are strong and prices are rising briskly. In other markets, prices are declining. In the eastern capital cities, a considerable additional supply of apartments is scheduled to come on stream over the next couple of years. Growth in rents is the slowest for two decades. Borrowing for housing by investors has picked up over recent months. Supervisory measures have contributed to some strengthening of lending standards.
Taking account of the available information the Board judged that holding the stance of policy unchanged at this meeting would be consistent with sustainable growth in the economy and achieving the inflation target over time.
</body></html>

Rental growth slowest in two decades: RBA Governor Philip Lowe's March 2017 statement

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/67056/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) sees housing finance as a smaller danger than in the past, judging by its latest Financial Stability Review, but we aren’t back to happy days just yet.
A number of economic indicators still show there’s cause for concern in the property market. 
The review does acknowledge some problems in the apartment markets in Brisbane and Melbourne, but it sees major threats to the resilience of the Australian financial system overseas: examples are the rising debt levels in China, the low performance of European banks, the Brexit, and the impact of low milk prices on New Zealand farmers (with a possible feedback effect to Australian banks).
The review highlights Australian banks’ stronger capital buffers and compliance with toughened prudential standards from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). Because house price growth has moderated and mortgage borrowers are substantially ahead of their scheduled payments, the risk from mortgage lending is somewhat lower. 
However, it’s surprising that the review doesn’t stress some aspects that are obvious.
What the RBA didn’t say
Although Australia hasn’t experienced the type of shock to the economy the United States did, due to the sub-prime mortgage crisis, there is substantial risk due to a large portion of mortgage loans being subject to interest-only periods of typically five years. Research for US home equity lines of credit finds the risk that people won’t be able to pay mortgage expenses increases substantially towards the end of flexible repayment terms, in particular during times of increasing lending standards.
Mortgage borrowers often have the expectation that they are able to refinance at the end of the interest-only term into a similar loan with a new interest-only period. However, this rollover is not possible in economic downturns when banks suddenly tighten their lending standards and and are likely to cut refinancing. 
The RBA’s review shows that Australian banks have tightened their lending standards and have room for further tightening, but currently we do not see larger impacts on delinquencies. Current rates of people not being able to make their mortgage payments are low but may quickly change in an economic downturn. It’s also difficult to forecast whether this will change judging by medium- to long-term trends. 
There might be other reasons why people might struggle to make their mortgage repayments. We have seen central banks following the European and US central banks in lowering interest rates and markets are expecting a reversal in the future. As most mortgage loans in Australia are at a floating rate this would imply that the largest relative payment increase will be to interest-only loans, should the RBA follow these leads. 
In addition to this, Australia continues to enjoy low unemployment rates. This may change and lower the average income levels, putting more stress on people’s ability to pay mortgage loans.
Other risk factors at play in the property market
House prices continue to grow at annualised rates of approximately 10.2% and 9% in the largest cities Sydney and Melbourne. Housing price growth has slowed down, but prices are still increasing and new mortgages are underwritten based on house prices that are disengaged with national income levels. The growth rate continues to be above the historic averages and other developed economies that have experienced similar rate cuts.
Banks have relatively reduced interest only loans and high loan to valuation ratio (LVR) style loans. However, it is also clear that origins of high risk mortgages continue at relative high levels. 
Australian Prudential Regulation, new mortgage loans for ADIs with greater than $1 bn of term loans
The fraction of interest-only loans has come down from 44% in December 2014 to 36% in March 2016. While this is a noticable decrease, more than a third of loans continue to be interest-only.
The RBA’s review argues that Australian mortgage borrowers are on average approximately two and a half years ahead of the scheduled payments. This argument does not take interest-only loans into account. 
Prepayments are generally made into offset accounts which include a redraw facility and are generally used when new properties are used. In other words, these prepayments may be quickly depleted to increase leverage but also in situations when borrowers have difficulties making payments. 
Dominance of housing loans on bank books
The largest problem of Australian banks remains the dominance of housing loans on bank books. Approximately 60% of total loans are for residential properties, and 36% of loans are business loans dominated by commercial real estate loans and loans to small and medium sized companies, which are often backed by the real estate of the business owner. 
This over-concentration is the Achilles’ heel of the Australian banking system and hard to protect against. It’s a reflection of demand for bank loans in Australia and alternatives to bank lending available to large firms. 
International financial markets may provide a solution, allowing banks to diversify and risk transfer via asset risk swaps. Unfortunately, these solutions have not been explored much in the past . The reluctance to do this is mostly based on the poor performance of overseas assets during the global financial crisis.
The RBA’s review further discusses the achievements under the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to limit the systemic risk of financial institutions via increased regulation and higher capital buffers. The review further notes that no Australian bank is of global systemic importance. 
However this is not a reason for complacency as the failure of one of the largest Australian banks would lead to a great shock to the Australian economy. A further concentration in the banking industry would make bank products more expensive than they would be in a competitive system.
Harry Scheule is associate professor, Finance, UTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/harry-scheule-3573" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

The risks in Australia’s housing market shouldn’t be downplayed

<html><body>
Statement by Philip Lowe, Governor: Monetary Policy Decision
At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 1.50 percent.
Conditions in the global economy have improved over recent months. Both global trade and industrial production have picked up. Labour markets have tightened in many countries. Above-trend growth is expected in a number of advanced economies, although uncertainties remain. In China, growth is being supported by higher spending on infrastructure and property construction. This composition of growth and the rapid increase in borrowing mean that the medium-term risks to Chinese growth remain. The improvement in the global economy has contributed to higher commodity prices, which are providing a significant boost to Australia’s national income.
Headline inflation rates have moved higher in most countries, partly reflecting the higher commodity prices. Core inflation remains low. Long-term bond yields are higher than last year, although in a historical context they remain low. Interest rates have increased in the United States and there is no longer an expectation of additional monetary easing in other major economies. Financial markets have been functioning effectively.
The Australian economy is continuing its transition following the end of the mining investment boom. Recent data are consistent with ongoing moderate growth. Most measures of business confidence are at, or above, average and non-mining business investment has risen over the past year. At the same time, some indicators of conditions in the labour market have softened recently. In particular, the unemployment rate has moved a little higher and employment growth is modest. The various forward-looking indicators still point to continued growth in employment over the period ahead. Wage growth remains slow.
The outlook continues to be supported by the low level of interest rates. Lenders have recently announced increases in mortgage rates, particularly those paid by investors. Financial institutions remain in a good position to lend. The depreciation of the exchange rate since 2013 has also assisted the economy in its transition following the mining investment boom. An appreciating exchange rate would complicate this adjustment.
Inflation remains quite low. Headline inflation is expected to pick up over the course of 2017 to be above 2 per cent. The rise in underlying inflation is expected to be a bit more gradual with growth in labour costs remaining subdued.
Conditions in the housing market continue to vary considerably around the country. In some markets, conditions are strong and prices are rising briskly. In other markets, prices are declining. In the eastern capital cities, a considerable additional supply of apartments is scheduled to come on stream over the next couple of years. Growth in rents is the slowest for two decades.
Growth in household borrowing, largely to purchase housing, continues to outpace growth in household income. By reinforcing strong lending standards, the recently announced supervisory measures should help address the risks associated with high and rising levels of indebtedness. Lenders need to ensure that the serviceability metrics that they use are appropriate for current conditions. A reduced reliance on interest-only housing loans in the Australian market would also be a positive development.
Taking account of the available information, the Board judged that holding the stance of monetary policy unchanged at this meeting would be consistent with sustainable growth in the economy and achieving the inflation target over time.
Philip Lowe's statement was first published on <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2017/mr-17-07" target="_blank">The RBA website here.</a>
</body></html>

Reserve Bank

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Reserve Bank

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News