The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street

The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street
The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street

A'Beckett Street is arguably the best example of any inner city locale when considering the rapid change that has befallen inner Melbourne in recent years. With 2010 as a starting point, no less than 16 separate projects have or are seeking to maintain a frontage to A'Beckett Street, radically altering its feel and composition.

Apartments projects have been the most popular pursuit, with education-based builds and serviced apartment projects also represented. Moreover, the eastern end of the street, at the intersection with Swanston Street, will bear witness to the 'City North' station as part of the Melbourne Metro which according to available public domain information, will be located directly under Swanston Street between Franklin and La Trobe Streets.

For so long an almost 'sleepy' part of Melbourne's CBD with low-rise buildings lining either side, the new built form along A'Beckett Street has radically altered the streetscape with an overabundance of tall, slim towers with little to no setbacks.

A chronology of A'Beckett Street's evolution since 2010 is as follows:

The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street
A'Beckett Apartments, A'Beckett Tower and City Tempo

The very modest A'Beckett Apartments was first to reach completion during 2010, followed closely by the altogether mediocre City Tempo serviced apartment development on A'Beckett and Queen. Some Elenberg Fraser-inspired style resulted in the colourful A'Beckett Tower; what essentially became Pan Urban's swansong project with a 2011 completion and the 2011 Dulux Colour Award to boot.

The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street
Swanston Academic Building and 206 A'Beckett Street

Arguably A'Beckett Street's greatest new built form arrived during 2012 with RMIT's Swanston Academic Building taking its place opposite A'Beckett Tower, with both combining to provide the Swanston Street panorama with an exemplary splash of colour and design dare.

2012 also ushered in the Pegasus Apart'Hotel at 206 A'Beckett Street, a Doig Architecture creation delivered by Merkon Constructions.

The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street
MY80, Istana and Fulton Lane

2014 and 2015 saw A'Beckett Street change evolve further, this time at the hands of Malaysian-based developers.

MY80 in many ways set the pace and scale for what would and still continuing to be the building boom in the northern reaches of Melbourne's CBD. Mammoth Empire's success with MY80 was replicated with Magna Prima's Istana and SP Setia's Fulton Lane; Asian developer-backed super-sized projects had arrived on A'Beckett Street!

The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street
Avant, Empire and EQ Tower

At present three substantial residential towers are under construction with all being backed by Asian-affiliated developers.

EQ Tower is well into construction as is Empire on Elizabeth and A'Beckett, while Avant Tower is the most recent start with Probuild tasked with delivering the 57-level tower which will be cloaked in a distinctive hue of pink upon completion.

The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street
Queens Place will bring a new vigour to A'Brckett Street

What shapes to be the biggest build also promises much by way of street level activation. Queens Place is dominated by two hulking residential towers yet it will be at street level where it's hoped the project will shine.

Cox Architecture and Fender Katsalidis have created a highly articulated podium for the project that is very accommodating at street level; should the project live up to the renders it will be a clear winner on a public realm level and may well put its other A'Beckett Street contemporaries to shame.

The chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street
111-125 A’Beckett, 183-189 A'Beckett, 48-50 A'Beckett and 24-46 A'Beckett

Four substantial projects are still at planning, headed by Tong Eng Group's 111-125 A’Beckett Street. While it has support from City of Melbourne, another contemporary at 183-189 A’Beckett Street has fallen short of City of Melbourne's expectations. Having said that, the final decision lies with the Minister for Planning.

What was briefly marketed as Uni Tower at 48-50 A'Beckett went back to planning and duly received the green light during December 2015 while the latest entrant to A'Beckett Street is RMIT's fresh proposal for a mixed-use tower opposite their Swanston Academic Building. This is the subject of a separate article.

A'Beckett Street has been transformed in a remarkably short period of time and with a number of ripe development sites tagged for development its evolution from quite CBD street to a prime apartment tower hot spot looks set to continue.

Comments (17)

Help contribute to the Urban community by leaving your comments about this article
What would you like to say about this project?
3000
I would actually like to see Bilby write an article for UM. You're obviously well researched in heritage and the history of Melbourne. Perhaps it would be a good opportunity to clear the air regarding your views on development in Melbourne once and for all.
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?
SYmlb
For what it's worth, I enjoyed the article. I also remember when A'Beckett was an unknown street, amazing to see how it has changed.
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?
bilby
I have no idea what you are talking about, Adrian.

When have I ever expressed what could be described as an "anti-highrise" or "anti-development" view? (Quotes to support your rant please).

What I have argued above is:

1. The article presents itself as "a chronology and evolution of A'Beckett Street" with barely any reference to the specific ways in which the street has changed, apart from the obvious (there are now towers and development sites appearing).
2. The heritage buildings lost in the last few years on A'Beckett Street could easily have been integrated with new development - high-rise or otherwise.
3. The fact that developers chose not to do this has incurred an uncessary opportunity cost on the city. In other words, the street has lost something important, in planning and urbanism terms, that could have been retained had other (better) decisions been made.

What is tiresome is the doe-eyed, uncritical, congratulatory rhetoric of some commentators on this site every time mention is made of how many towers developers have managed to pack into a CBD precinct or streetscape.Tall buildings are neither good nor bad in themselves - the design and planning of such imposing structures can be critiqued meaningfully, however.

So, I'll say it again - I have no problem with high rise buildings, and no problem with development of cities that actually has merit against certain civic and good design criteria. I do have a problem with the poverty of public discourse around these issues in Australia right now.
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?
Adrian's picture
Bilby your extremist anti highrise anti development views are getting really tiresome.

If you had a balanced and fair view of development in this city people might take you more seriously instead your just showing yourself up to be a Michael Buxton mouthpiece - perhaps it's your multi ?
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?
3000
Also I thought the "Uni Tower" proposal got knocked back/developer backed out given how shit it was.
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?

Pages