The Capitol of South Yarra

Love this article?
Republish this article on your website for free
Republish this article

Republish This Article

Feel free to publish this article on your website. We just ask that you do not edit the article and ensure that the author is correctly attributed! Just copy the code below into your CMS.

By copying the code below you are adhering to all our guidelines

The Capitol of South Yarra

Covered briefly earlier in the week, Urban Melbourne today takes an in depth look at the latest and greatest proposal for The Capitol in South Yarra. Acquired by former Dodo founder Larry Kestelman's LK Property Group it becomes the seventh incarnation in a long list of development proposals for the 5,600sqm former Capitol Bakeries site on the corner of Toorak Road and Chapel Street.

The Capitol of South Yarra
Fluid building form. © Bates Smart

Located within the rapidly evolving Forrest Hill precinct the project has been designed as a gateway development and an iconic landmark for the area, with an increase in height from 41-storeys to 58-storeys. As a result a subsequent refinement was undertaken resulting in more fluid forms articulated as a series of flowing horizontal ribbons across both masses before becoming more solid with an almost gill-like expression running up the face of the tallest tower.

Summary of changes

Aspect VCAT 2013 Current
Height 41-storeys 133m 58-storeys 190m, 208m to tip of spire
Dwellings 483 660
Parking 553 car spaces 630 basement car spaces 222 bicycle spaces
Retail 3,539sqm 4,530sqm of retail across two levels

Changes to Toorak Road Tower

There is an opportunity to bring the energy and curves created in the retail experience to the facade/balcony expression of the Toorak Road building.

Project Architect - Bates Smart

A series of changes have occurred since the previously endorsed VCAT scheme:

  • The removal of the return in plan with the intention to improve views and increase the separation between the two towers.
  • An increase of the floorplate width of 1.5m while still maintaining a 20m separation from the Chapel Street tower.
  • A reduction in the amount of balcony area to the Toorak Road frontage
  • A relocation of the core
  • Standardisation of all one bedroom apartments which can also be configured as a one bed + study

Changes to Chapel Street

The tower now presents as three ellipses not unlike Bates Smart's Queensbridge Tower proposal but with a tapering in mass as the tower rises, becoming increasingly slender towards its summit. This results in a more dynamic skyline silhouette than the previous scheme which presented as a uniform mass. One of the key changes is the reduction of the building mass at street level with an aim towards greatly improving the pedestrian experience.

We investigated an architectural language that creates a more distinctive sculptural object that celebrates the beauty of form and geometry. A form that might allow gradual slimming of the tower to create a unique landmark that has authenticity and identity. It would be an iconic contemporary destination in South Yarra. We tested the form of the tower to create a softer, more crafted quality which is in keeping with the new retail concept.

Bates Smart
The Capitol of South Yarra
Floor plate comparison. © Bates Smart

Retail podium

Major design changes have also been made to the retail podiums since the approved VCAT scheme, with a new retail brief being implemented encouraging pedestrians through the site by way of curved retail frontages. These design strategies are as follows:

  • The relocation of all car parking to below ground
  • An increase in retail areas and circulation which takes advantage of level changes
  • Decreased podium down to two-levels, providing a more human scale to the street
  • Rooftop garden and amenities level
  • The removal of the central retail component to open up the development to the street
  • The introduction of more retail to Toorak Road to reflect its prominence
  • The resolution of tower geometries and interface with amenities and retail
  • A target NLA of 4,600sqm (over two floors)

According to the planning application the retail has been peeled back to allow the street to extend into the heart of the retail podium with a welcoming entry to Chapel Street.

The Capitol of South Yarra
Retail podium elevation of VCAT Scheme. © Bates Smart
The Capitol of South Yarra
Revised retail podium elevation. © Bates Smart


Just how high is considered too high? At 193m to LMR The Capitol development would easily surpass Royal Domain Towers on St Kilda road as the tallest high-rise outside of the Melbourne CBD/Southbank and provide a visual landmark and focal point to the South Yarra skyline. It would also set a precedent for more towers of similar height and scale particularly if it can be argued that South Yarra as part of the Plan Melbourne blueprint must facilitate the expected influx of residents to Melbourne via concentrated high-rise development.

Height in particular shouldn't be the core reason for a development's refusal unless it comes at the detriment to the amenity of the street and pedestrian particularly along busy retail strips such as Toorak Road and Chapel Streets. The planning report indicates that "sunlight penetration to footpaths and public open spaces is maintained as per the approved scheme, with cut-outs at the podium level (Level 1) ensuring solar access through to the retail levels below."

I don't believe I'm alone in suggesting that this could prove to be a game changer for the way activity centres such as South Yarra develop and Urban Melbourne will no doubt be keeping a close eye on the planning process.

A slideshow of earlier schemes is included below.

Project team

  • Developer: LK Property Group
  • Architect: Bates Smart
  • Planning Consultant: Ratio Consultants
  • Traffic Consultant: Traffix
  • ESD Consultant: Norman Disney & Young
  • Wind Consultant: MEL Consult
  • Waste Consultant: Leigh Design
The Capitol of South Yarra
An earlier scheme for the site towering over South Yarra. © Bates Smart/Floodslicer
  • The Capitol of South Yarra
  • The Capitol of South Yarra
  • The Capitol of South Yarra
  • The Capitol of South Yarra
  • The Capitol of South Yarra
  • The Capitol of South Yarra
  • The Capitol of South Yarra

The latest industry news on your website

Republish Urban content on your website

Republish this article

Discussion (7 comments)

Riccardo's picture

Excellent project, and glad to see height like that. South Yarra should be the new Chatswood.

Bilby's picture

Yes ... Chatswood - urban design icon of Australia

Riccardo's picture

Was that sarcasm? Didn't work for me. I regard Chatswood as a paragon of what is possible in Australia. Sydney has got the urban development puzzle mostly sorted - get major urban sites on rail, build them up and up. The only rational reason for restricting high rise development is insufficient road and rail capacity to move them, a problem neither Chatswood nor South Yarra face.

For what its worth, the last of these photos, by Upwards on SSC espouses true beauty.

The Padang effect is brilliant, rendering Chatswood more like Singapore than
Hong Kong. Melbourne High's fields could have done this too, just needed more height.

Sydney is confidently embracing its future large population, building the underground rail network it needs, getting more height happening, diversifying its population. Melbourne should learn from that.

Bilby's picture

So the debate is about beauty for you, Riccardo? I think we are at least partially arguing for the same thing, then - a well planned, dense city with aesthetic qualities that increase the pleasure of living within it for residents and visitors alike. It seems that you are just as concerned with these issues as the heritage advocates you seem to be opposed to, no?

Riccardo's picture

Of course I like a beautiful streetscape or skyline. One of the true beauties of that Chatswood photo is that the government owns the sports field in the foreground, didn't force its retention on an unwilling private owner, unlike heritage laws.

Is a great link to look at too about St Leonards. Willoughby is as Booroondara or Stonnington as you will ever find in Sydney, and they have sensibly decided not to have the debate about whether to have height in their urban cores, only how high. Melbourne has much to learn, that you can do your best to relieve pressure on the leafy backstreets if you divert developers attention to the rundown, expired and very accessible main roads and railways.

All the oppose everything school of NIMBYism does is predictably bring the Minister, and his department more importantly, down upon you. And if they don't get you VCAT will. Councils need to be a lot more accepting of steering good high density development their way, they might be better able to engage them in the aesthetics if they are not fighting every step of the way.

Rohan Storey's picture

Yes height itself isnt a problem, its what the project as a whole does to the street. This scheme is quite fat, even wider than the last one, and the podium / separate building is quite tall, and so out of scale with the low typical retail strip built form. So it will overshadow a large amount of the intersection for far more than the winter months. I suppose if it was the ONLY one, we could live with it...

Also the main tower seems to rise practically straight from the footbath, with very little setback, so it will be very visually dominant.

A pair of slimmer towers setback from the street, same height or taller, would fix those problems.

There is a big issue in melbourne with taller buildings on the north side of the east/west shopping street in the inner / middle rings. Even six storeys straight up means the southern footpath is dark all year, but sadly theres no over-arching regulation dealing with this issue. Im not saying never taller than five, but three or four max on street then upper level setbacks would help, and certainly striaght up developments should not be too wide (not sure how wide is too wide but that glaxosmithkline at the end of johnston street abbotsford is too wide in my opinion) and there shouldnt be rows of them, all straight up and overshadowy.


tiankd74's picture

Does anyone feel that it looks like Aurora Melbourne Central?

Back to top
Note: Every effort is made to ensure accurate information is provided. If information is out of date, or factually incorrect, please get it touch so we can rectify. Urban accepts no liability and responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient through relying on anything contained or omitted from our publication and platform. Opinions expressed by writers are that of the writer, and may not reflect that of Urban.
Are you a frequent user? Sign in or Register.