Stamp duty reforms are an insult: REINSW

Stamp duty reforms are an insult: REINSW
Stamp duty reforms are an insult: REINSW


Reforms to Stamp Duty announced by the NSW Government are an insult to those people trying to purchase a home in NSW.

The Treasurer’s statement on November 5 provides no genuine relief to home buyers, it’s nothing more than hype and bluster in the lead up to the election, according to Real Estate Institute of NSW.

The State Government’s intention to index Stamp Duty by reference to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) starting from 1 July 2019 without adjusting the tax brackets is a real sleight of hand.

NSW Treasurer Dominic Perrottet has acknowledged that the stamp duty rates have not been amended since they were introduced in 1986 and then says that he is going to apply indexation (CPI) to the set of tax brackets that are 32 years out of date!

In 1986 the Sydney median house price was $93,576 and the median unit price was $86,109. At that time the overwhelming amount of property transactions did not attract the higher rates of tax.

Now with the Sydney median house price at $956,000 and the median unit price at $730,000 the overwhelming amount of transactions do attract the higher rates of tax.

By sitting on their hands for 32 years successive Governments have unconscionably profited at the expense of the home buyers including the most vulnerable - first home buyers.

The first tax bracket tops out at, $14,000. I ask rhetorically when was the last time you heard of someone buying a house for $14,000?

Yes, indexing is good, and the Treasury says had it been introduced 15 years ago then it would be better now - I agree. In fact if it had of been done 32 years ago it would be even better and deliver a far more equitable outcome for the property consumer (see table below).

If the Government is serious about Stamp Duty reform it must adjust the brackets to reflect today’s median house price and then index it from there

To do anything other than that is delivering reform without substance and is just disingenuous political grandstanding.

The Government’s own published data sets out clearly the continuing decline in property transactions and consequential Stamp Duty revenue.

The irony? There is empirical evidence demonstrating that a reduction in the rate of tax will drive more additional transactions and consequently more revenue for Government.

Stamp Duty brackets - what they are and what they should be

Stamp duty reforms are an insult: REINSW

Tim McKibbin is the REINSW CEO 

Stamp Duty Reinsw

Community Discussion

Be the first one to comment on this article
What would you like to say about this project?