1-5 Queen Street rejected by City of Melbourne

1-5 Queen Street rejected by City of Melbourne
1-5 Queen Street rejected by City of Melbourne

Height, overshadowing and heritage; the Holy Trinity of inner-city development concerns that's sure to garner mainstream media attention. This was indeed the case during 2014 when plans were revealed for the redevelopment of the Fletcher Jones site at 1-5 Queen Street which sits directly opposite the Banana Alley vaults.

Malaysian-backed Creative Wealth (Aust) Pty Ltd commissioned the project with CBD-based K2LD Architects conceiving the residential tower which at 25 levels and 90.75 metres would have made an instant impression upon its more modest in height neighbours.​

 1-5 Queen Street rejected by City of Melbourne
Artists' renders of the rejected development. Image © K2LD

According to a Business Day the 746sqm site was owned and occupied by retailer Fletcher Jones since 1955, until falling into private ownership post 1993. With the onsite Cobden Buildings structure originally dated 1872, groups such as Melbourne Heritage Action considered the redevelopment as little more than facadism with the Flinders Street edifice the most notable feature retained within the proposed redevelopment.

Enter 2015 and City of Melbourne have elected to reject the proposal in its current form. Almost six months to the day after the initial planning application was lodged, the decision to rebuke 1-5 Queen Street was made public on January 13. According to Melbourne Heritage Action, City of Melbourne's refusal was based upon a number of factors with the tower's adverse affect upon the heritage listed existing building and its Queen Street neighbours at the forefront.

 1-5 Queen Street rejected by City of Melbourne
Proposed Queen Street frontage. Image © K2LD

Seen above was the intended Queen Street facade which was to have replaced the 1970's augmented frontage, which up until that point matched the Flinders Street frontage. A modern interpretation of what once was there, the facade would have employed stone and metal.

As with most developers Creative Wealth (Aust) Pty Ltd would now seemingly have two options at hand. A trip to VCAT may be on the cards as could be a new planning application that better addresses the concerns outlined by City of Melbourne.

Mark Baljak

Mark Baljak

Tags: 
City of Melbourne Queen Street Heritage

Comments (4)

Help contribute to the Urban community by leaving your comments about this article
What would you like to say about this project?
Cityscape
I bet the CoM can't wait to knock back more proposals, just to show the ratepayers that they're on the ball.
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?
3000
Or maybe they want to stop shitty proposals that do the bare minimum under the guise of "facades".
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?
Adrian's picture
Surprise Surprise .. looked like a nice bit of glass shard that too.
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?
3000
Well maybe the developers should try harder next time. Looked like a rather lame glass box to me.
Helpful
(0)
Not helpful
(0)
Reply

Reply to this comment

What would you like to respond to this comment?