Forums / Melbourne Metropolitan & Regional Victoria discussion / Projects & Construction / SOUTHBANK | 51-65 CLARKE ST | 233M | 70L | RESIDENTIAL
23 posts in this thread / 0 new
Log in or register to post comments
Last post

SOUTHBANK | 51-65 CLARKE ST | 233M | 70L | RESIDENTIAL

Riddlz's picture
#1
Riddlz wrote on Thu, 02/02/2017 - 14:15

Back to top
drunkill's picture
#2
drunkill wrote on Thu, 02/02/2017 - 17:51

Loving it. It has a similar design to the original 248-250 Sturt Street proposal before that got dumbed down to a boring box.

If Elysium finally happens these two should be great neighbours.

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#3
Mark Baljak wrote on Fri, 03/02/2017 - 17:01

One of the more interesting designs come up for a while

Back to top
Peter Maltezos's picture
#4
Peter Maltezos wrote on Sat, 04/02/2017 - 10:35

^^ That's the way!

Not that hard to get an interesting twist (pardon the pun) to the standard rectangular box. yessmileyyes

I collect, therefore I am. thecollectormm.com.au
Back to top
Riddlz's picture
#5
Riddlz wrote on Thu, 27/04/2017 - 20:19

Approved

https://lodgement.planning-permits.delwp.vic.gov.au/public/detail/339

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#6
Mark Baljak wrote on Fri, 28/04/2017 - 06:45

Will be a good addition on Southbank

Back to top
3000's picture
#7
3000 wrote on Fri, 28/04/2017 - 09:04

Not bad. What will be in that rather large podium?

Back to top
Qantas743's picture
#8
Qantas743 wrote on Fri, 28/04/2017 - 12:53

3 or so years to commence construction. Hopefully the market will have improved so this one has plenty of time.

Back to top
Dean's picture
#9
Dean wrote on Sat, 29/04/2017 - 19:55

Fkn lol. Consistent 80%+ clearance rates, double digit growth year on year. Probably the largest boom in Australian history but you're still fkn negative and in fairy land. get a life.
Or maybe you're talking about the port headland market??

Back to top
Melb on's picture
#10
Melb on wrote on Sat, 29/04/2017 - 22:39

I agree Dean, all he does is bag Andrews/Wynne and rave on about how good things would be under that fool Liberal Guy. One more negative from this one and we should have him 'removed'............

Back to top
Melb on's picture
#11
Melb on wrote on Sat, 29/04/2017 - 22:40

!

Back to top
Melb on's picture
#12
Melb on wrote on Sat, 29/04/2017 - 22:44

From the Forum......................of course.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture
#13
Qantas743 wrote on Sun, 30/04/2017 - 11:47

Banning people from having opinions goes down really well in North Korea. Perhaps you should move there if you love the concept so much.

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture
#14
MelbourneGuy wrote on Sun, 30/04/2017 - 14:38

It is a forum after all boys and everyone's entitled to their views.

Back to top
3000's picture
#15
3000 wrote on Sun, 30/04/2017 - 16:00

Doesn't mean he isn't a knob.

Back to top
Bilby's picture
#16
Bilby wrote on Sun, 30/04/2017 - 20:38

... and girls.

Back to top
Primal Beauty's picture
#17
Primal Beauty wrote on Sun, 30/04/2017 - 21:29

Yay...all the girls are on my team!

Back to top
Adrian's picture
#18
Adrian wrote on Tue, 02/05/2017 - 02:26

Approved at full height one would presume ..

Who is the developer again ? This will sort of make up for its defunct neighbour presuming it's not just more flip bait ...

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#19
Mark Baljak wrote on Tue, 02/05/2017 - 06:15

Newcity Development (One) Pty Ltd - part of Newcity Development Group/Brilliland Group from China

Back to top
Riddlz's picture
#20
Riddlz wrote on Tue, 06/06/2017 - 09:03

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#21
Mark Baljak wrote on Tue, 06/06/2017 - 12:41

If 54 Clarke gets up alongside this, they'll be two of the better looking buildings in Melbourne

Back to top
Qantas743's picture
#22
Qantas743 wrote on Wed, 07/06/2017 - 07:31

Those renders mean this is either about to be marketed or about to be flipped.

Back to top
Riddlz's picture
#23
Riddlz wrote on Tue, 08/05/2018 - 13:54

^^On the money again qantas

Back to top