Forums / Melbourne Metropolitan & Regional Victoria discussion / Projects & Construction / Archived Projects / CBD | 22-32 Little LaTrobe Street | 17L | Residential
26 posts in this thread / 0 new
Quick reply
Last post

CBD | 22-32 Little LaTrobe Street | 17L | Residential

Ryan Seychell's picture
#1
Ryan Seychell wrote on Thu, 22/08/2013 - 20:15

There's a good reason why there aren't many renders of this building floating about:

 

Back to top
Qantas743's picture
#2
Qantas743 wrote on Thu, 22/08/2013 - 20:43

Ah so THAT'S what's going here!

Have been wondering ever since they put that crane up!

Thanks Ryan!

Back to top
Kycon's picture
#3
Kycon wrote on Thu, 22/08/2013 - 23:27

I had been wondering what was going here since they dug out the basement 3 years ago......

This won't be a good outcome once viewed from swanston st/library. That beautiful bronze glass of A'beckett tower will be forever lost :(

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#4
Ryan Seychell wrote on Thu, 12/09/2013 - 19:43

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#5
Ryan Seychell wrote on Fri, 04/10/2013 - 15:00

Back to top
Melbman's picture
#6
Melbman wrote on Fri, 04/10/2013 - 19:48

^^ I like the neighbouring buildings in that area, so I hope this does not bring along further buildings which takes away the character.

A few concrete blocks with patterns is not exactly looking too promising. but the laneway bridge looks interesting.

Back to top
Melbourne_Fragments's picture
#7
Melbourne_Fragments wrote on Tue, 08/10/2013 - 00:07

Both pretty crap designs for a central location. and hope no more of the character buildings in Lt La Trobe go, but none are heritage listed so it's likely

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#8
Ryan Seychell wrote on Tue, 22/10/2013 - 21:28

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#9
Mark Baljak wrote on Mon, 25/11/2013 - 07:01

Back to top
Melbourne_Fragments's picture
#10
Melbourne_Fragments wrote on Mon, 25/11/2013 - 13:16

There's a problem of complete lack of setbacks happening more and more, particularly in the 'little' streets and lanes where human scale should be paramount

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#11
Ryan Seychell wrote on Thu, 12/12/2013 - 22:41

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#12
Mark Baljak wrote on Tue, 17/12/2013 - 05:14

nearly topped out

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#13
Mark Baljak wrote on Mon, 20/01/2014 - 06:46

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#14
Ryan Seychell wrote on Wed, 22/01/2014 - 23:23

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#15
Mark Baljak wrote on Mon, 24/02/2014 - 07:51

hrrm, not looking completely shite

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#16
Mark Baljak wrote on Tue, 25/03/2014 - 07:42

at least they tried something

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#17
Ryan Seychell wrote on Tue, 01/04/2014 - 21:58

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#18
Ryan Seychell wrote on Tue, 06/05/2014 - 19:37

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#19
Mark Baljak wrote on Thu, 05/06/2014 - 06:04

not sure what this application is for given its just completed, maybe a subdivision

3/06/2014
TP-2007-275/B
Development of a 17 level and basement building for use as 122 residential apartments and two ground floor retail tenancies

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#20
Ryan Seychell wrote on Thu, 05/06/2014 - 22:22

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#21
Mark Baljak wrote on Fri, 06/06/2014 - 07:14

the precast sides look better than the front, that's saying something

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
#22
Ryan Seychell wrote on Mon, 09/06/2014 - 13:10

Hopefully there's a nice little cafe' down the bottom here

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
#23
Mark Baljak wrote on Sat, 23/08/2014 - 06:07

Back to top
drunkill's picture
#24
drunkill wrote on Sat, 23/08/2014 - 16:20

What a shocker.

Back to top
Michael Berquez's picture
#25
Michael Berquez wrote on Sun, 24/08/2014 - 09:54

Absolutely horrific

Back to top
Rohan Storey's picture
#26
Rohan Storey wrote on Wed, 21/03/2018 - 10:14

Hmm is there an architect to take responsibility ?

Lookingupatbuildings

Back to top