Forums / Melbourne Metropolitan & Regional Victoria discussion / Projects & Construction / Archived Projects / CBD | 22-32 Little LaTrobe Street | 17L | Residential
26 posts in this thread / 0 new
Log in or register to post comments
Last post

CBD | 22-32 Little LaTrobe Street | 17L | Residential

Ryan Seychell's picture
#1
Ryan Seychell wrote on Thu, 22/08/2013 - 20:15

There's a good reason why there aren't many renders of this building floating about:

 

Back to top
Qantas743's picture
Qantas743 wrote on Thu, 22/08/2013 - 20:43

Ah so THAT'S what's going here!

Have been wondering ever since they put that crane up!

Thanks Ryan!

Back to top
Kycon's picture
Kycon wrote on Thu, 22/08/2013 - 23:27

I had been wondering what was going here since they dug out the basement 3 years ago......

This won't be a good outcome once viewed from swanston st/library. That beautiful bronze glass of A'beckett tower will be forever lost :(

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Thu, 12/09/2013 - 19:43

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Fri, 04/10/2013 - 15:00

Back to top
Melbman's picture
Melbman wrote on Fri, 04/10/2013 - 19:48

^^ I like the neighbouring buildings in that area, so I hope this does not bring along further buildings which takes away the character.

A few concrete blocks with patterns is not exactly looking too promising. but the laneway bridge looks interesting.

Back to top
Melbourne_Fragments's picture
Melbourne_Fragments wrote on Tue, 08/10/2013 - 00:07

Both pretty crap designs for a central location. and hope no more of the character buildings in Lt La Trobe go, but none are heritage listed so it's likely

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Tue, 22/10/2013 - 21:28

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
Mark Baljak wrote on Mon, 25/11/2013 - 07:01

Back to top
Melbourne_Fragments's picture
Melbourne_Fragments wrote on Mon, 25/11/2013 - 13:16

There's a problem of complete lack of setbacks happening more and more, particularly in the 'little' streets and lanes where human scale should be paramount

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Thu, 12/12/2013 - 22:41

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
Mark Baljak wrote on Tue, 17/12/2013 - 05:14

nearly topped out

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
Mark Baljak wrote on Mon, 20/01/2014 - 06:46

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Wed, 22/01/2014 - 23:23

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
Mark Baljak wrote on Mon, 24/02/2014 - 07:51

hrrm, not looking completely shite

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
Mark Baljak wrote on Tue, 25/03/2014 - 07:42

at least they tried something

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Tue, 01/04/2014 - 21:58

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Tue, 06/05/2014 - 19:37

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
Mark Baljak wrote on Thu, 05/06/2014 - 06:04

not sure what this application is for given its just completed, maybe a subdivision

3/06/2014
TP-2007-275/B
Development of a 17 level and basement building for use as 122 residential apartments and two ground floor retail tenancies

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Thu, 05/06/2014 - 22:22

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
Mark Baljak wrote on Fri, 06/06/2014 - 07:14

the precast sides look better than the front, that's saying something

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture
Ryan Seychell wrote on Mon, 09/06/2014 - 13:10

Hopefully there's a nice little cafe' down the bottom here

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture
Mark Baljak wrote on Sat, 23/08/2014 - 06:07

Back to top
Andrew's picture
Andrew wrote on Sat, 23/08/2014 - 16:20

What a shocker.

Back to top
Michael Berquez's picture
Michael Berquez wrote on Sun, 24/08/2014 - 09:54

Absolutely horrific

Back to top
Rohan Storey's picture
Rohan Storey wrote on Wed, 21/03/2018 - 10:14

Hmm is there an architect to take responsibility ?

Lookingupatbuildings

Back to top