Borrowing to purchase investments increases the risk of losses

Borrowing to purchase investments increases the risk of losses
Borrowing to purchase investments increases the risk of losses

GUEST OBSERVER

whether or not the government removes the ability of self managed super funds (SMSFs) to borrow to purchase property or other investments, the implications for investors are relatively minor.

With rare exceptions, borrowing to purchase assets outside super is far simpler and more tax-effective than borrowing in an SMSF.

Even ignoring the strict regulations governing limited recourse borrowing by an SMSF, the maximum tax benefit from deductions including borrowing costs, depreciation allowances and other expenses is the superannuation fund tax rate of 15 per cent. In pension funds there’s no tax benefit.

In personal names, the tax benefit ranges from 34.5 percent to 49 percent, providing a much larger benefit from borrowing, especially to purchase low-yielding property assets.

Complicating matters for SMSF property purchasers, regulations prohibit related party transactions except in the case of business rental property. In practical terms, the restriction on related party use reduces the tenancy options, preventing use of the property by owners or their children.

No such limitations apply to the use of negative-geared personally owned properties which can be used as a future personal residence by the owner or children. Even after the regulator’s tightening of individual investment borrowing, providing the collateral and obtaining a high loan-to-valuation ratio is much easier than borrowing in an SMSF.

The low 15 percent superannuation tax rate increases the attractions of owning high-yielding assets in super funds instead of in personal names. Property assets generating low current income and steady or even spectacular capital gains are better suited to personal portfolios, especially for longer-term investors.

In superannuation, any capital gains tax rate on gains realised after 12 months is only 10 per cent compared with up to 24.5 percent on gains realised in personal names. Given that capital gains tax is only payable when assets are sold, this advantage is most significant when assets are bought and sold regularly.

Property investments are generally held for longer, particularly compared with shares. For this reason, as well as the higher annual income including franking credits, borrowing to purchase shares in a super fund can help reduce capital gains tax bills.

Borrowing to purchase investments increases the risk of losses if the investments perform poorly. Investors need to be cautious when contemplating gearing their portfolios. Losses generated in superannuation and pension funds are difficult to recover as are losses in personal names. The one consolation for personal investors is the greater value of carry-forwarded capital losses as an offset to future capital gains.

Considering all the above factors, borrowing in an SMSF has major drawbacks.

Daryl Dixon is executive chairman of Dixon Advisory and can be contacted here.

Tags: 
Commercial Property Commercial Investment

Comments

Be the first one to comment on this article
What would you like to say about this project?