Investors react to Commission of Audit recommendations

The release of the Commission of Audit yesterday has recommended the federal government abolish support for funding through the Commercialisation Australia and Innovation Investment Fund.

The commission believes the government should stop providing assistance to startups as there was no greater public benefit, with benefits only for the companies.

“The intellectual property, and any profits arising from these new ideas remains with the business, and there are no clear public benefits arising,” the report says.

“The process of commercialising new products can often be a difficult one.

“However, skills and finance can be acquired from the private sector, and there is no clear reason for the Commonwealth to provide this assistance in competition with private sector providers.”

We spoke to a number of investors about their reaction to the recommendation and what impact, if any, it would have on the community.

Rui Rodrigues, investment manager, Tank Stream Ventures:

Rodrigues says that while the tech sector is not reliant on these grants, and nor should they be, there will be an impact in the industry should the recommendations be approved by the government.

“There grants are important in early stage startups and there will be consequences for the sector if they are abolished,” Rodrigues says.

He points out that Commercialisation Australia was responsible for commercialising Wi-Fi (a method was developed and patented by Australian CSIRO researchers to "unsmear" radio waves that echo off indoor surfaces making Wi-Fi possible) something the government was still reaping rewards from through licensing.

He says the audit was not well executed and there were no ideas on how to support innovation and no recommendations on how things could be done better.

“Companies will continue with these grants or not, it’s not critical, but they will be impacted,” Rodrigues says.  

Governments should not be responsible for investment in startups, but they do need to put incentives in place to facilitate it from the private sector.”

Adrian Stone, chairman, Investor’s Org and early stage investor:

Stone says his concern is for early stage startups, which were never well-supported by their Commercialisation Australia or the Innovation Investment Fund.

“They were relics of the old days developed along a manufacturing model that did not support startups well,” he says.

The crucial factor here, according to Stone, is that early stage investment represents better “bang for your buck.” Using government money to get in early would represent a greater reward to the economy in the long-run with smaller amounts of money needed.

“The Commercialisation Grant should stay, but it needs to be simplified,” Stone says. “Governments should be co-investing with investors and accelerators that know and understand the market.”

He says IIR was never relevant and in setting up accelerator Inspire 9, of which he is a partner, there was no government support available.

He says a new process that was quicker and simpler was needed by the industry and the current commercialisation grant, which insisted on startups being “pre-revenue”, went against lean startup best principles, forcing startups to apply at a stage where they hadn’t proven their viability as a business.

Clearly the government had a mandate to save money without giving much thought to the longer term impact beyond two years, he adds.

This article first appeared on StartUpSmart.