Momentous designs, both gained and lost in the space of a week

It's the stuff of roosters and feather dusters over the course of the last week. While the western end of Melbourne's CBD will be graced by a building unlike any other in Melbourne, Spring Street is set to receive a tower at the opposite end of the design scale.

As has been widely reported a new $300 million tower designed by international architecture firm Zaha Hadid Architects has been given final approval by the Victorian Government. Expected within developer Landream's 54 level tower, which weighs in at 176 metres, are 420 dwellings and in excess of 10,000sqm of office and retail space.

Designed in conjunction with Plus Architecture, the base of the tower at 582-606 Collins Street will also include ground floor art space, a public plaza to Collins Street and a new pedestrian link and a publicly accessible terrace.

582-606 Collins Street. Image: Zaha Hadid Architects

This stand-out design will enhance the city’s skyline, deliver jobs during construction and additional housing for people wanting to live in the CBD.

The late Zaha Hadid has been described as an a starchitect, Melbourne will now have a piece of her artistic flare and I look forward to seeing it come together and provide new public space in the city.

Jill Hennessy, Acting Minister for Planning

Working in close collaboration with Zaha Hadid Architects, Plus Architecture is deeply privileged to be a part of the team bringing Dame Zaha Hadid’s inspiring design to the Melbourne skyline with the project set to be a monumental part of our city’s urban fabric and architectural narrative.

Jess Liew, Director, Plus Architecture (local architects on record)

To 85 Spring Street now where revised images of Grocon's intended apartment development have appeared over online sales portals.

After much wrangling between the development team and the State planning department, a revised scheme of considerable design merit won approval during 2015 . Fast forward and gone is Denton Corker Marshall's design of note, replaced with a pared-down 39 level edifice.

The current version, seen below right, loses much of its architectural expression and appears externally to be little more than a generic design that smacks of value management.

Unfortunately, it also happens to be in a premier CBD location.

85 Spring Street, old and new. Images: ArchitectureAU &

And finally to a design spotted on Urban Melbourne's forum this week of a concept as seen below for Landream by Zaha Hadid Architects once more.

Urban Melbourne covered the story one year ago regarding Landream approaching CASA to initiate discussion on a possible tower for 254-260 La Trobe Street. The tower which was tall enough to challenge the PANS-OPS ceiling would have been of a similar height to the adjoining Aurora Melbourne Central that is now under construction.

The spectacular design that would now not adhere to the interim and soon permanent planning controls, may well be consigned to the history books.

Nonetheless a truly impressive design.

Zaha Hadid Architects' take on 260 La Trobe Street.


johnproctor's picture

That 260 La Trobe looks like the same design as the Hadid on Collins.

Hopefully whatever is built there takes a similar approach to the ground floor at that location. With Melbourne Central and CBD North station in the immediate vicinity and the massive growth in apartments in the area the 'plaza' style setback on that corner could be a nice little spot at that end of the City.

Back to top
SYmlb's picture

I wonder why Landream didn't proceed with the original Zaha design at La Trobe and instead with the shorter (and less profitable) tower on Collins? The tower on Collins was cut back too so it cannot be height restrictions? The other design for the La Trobe tower is fairly mediocre by comparison whereas the Hadid design is something else. Interesting.

And that proposal at Spring Street. The less said te better.

Back to top

Note: Every effort is made to ensure accurate information is provided. If information is out of date, or factually incorrect, please get it touch so we can rectify. Urban accepts no liability and responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient through relying on anything contained or omitted from our publication and platform. Opinions expressed by writers are that of the writer, and may not reflect that of Urban.