Melbourne Urban Design Meetup #3: The ethos and business model behind Nightingale

Following on from the first Melbourne Urban Design Meetup (MUDM) during February, Queens Collective at 20 Queen Street hosted the third MUDM event where James Legge of Six Degrees Architects gave a presentation on the design and business model that brought The Commons to fruition, and so too shortly The Nightingale located at 6 Florence Street, Brunswick.

Beginning with Six Degrees' Heller Street Park and Residences project, James Legge explored its rationale and consequently how it would inform the Nightingale. The aim was to design a contemporary terrace house, or more specifically family-centric medium density housing adjacent to a public park. The project was developed on a former municipal tip previously owned by the City of Moreland whom now own and maintain (for the most part) the park.

Two-thirds park and one-third apartments, the park is ultimately used by both residents and the wider community at large. Terraformed in such a way as to create public, semi-private and private spaces, Heller Street Park and Residences employed a visual barrier by way of a verge to naturally define public and private areas.

Heller Street Park and Residences. Image © Six Degrees

Heller Street Park and Residences is characterised by abstracted timber blocks which give the forms a 3-dimensional quality, a reaction against "developers stripping back." All plans are the same internally with the front of the terraces all enjoying a north facing aspect and each measuring 5.5m wide.

The articulation of the upper floor has been designed to give each town house an individual identity. James Legge emphasized the need to be mindful of where money is spent in terms of detailing, and that the odd bespoke characteristic (say stained glass entry lighting) provides for a richer architecture without adding significant cost to the project.

The presentation then moved on to cover the merits of The Commons and Nightingale model, how elements of Heller Street are entwined with their most recent projects and how Six Degrees came to be involved in the projects along with a raft of other architects.

Nightingale hero shot. Image © Breathe Architecture

Projects such as The Commons and Nightingale, Legge argues, are about architects taking the initiative and putting their money where their mouths are. The aim is simple: to provide quality apartments that are spacious, sustainable and affordable.

Architects have an obligation to the greater society to protect the interests of the people and the built environment but there is a concern that the responsibility of creating the urban environment has been taken out of the hands of the architect and is now the domain of the project manager.

Nightingale is a triple bottom line development. Apartments that are environmentally, socially and financially sustainable.

The ultimate goal of the project is to provide quality urban housing at an affordable price by simplifying both the development process and the building itself.

James Legge, Six Degrees Architects

The projects are about designing and facilitating community by encouraging engagement and interaction amongst residences via shared public spaces and rooftop gardens. Additionally apartments are designed in such a way that all rooms and living areas are afforded quality natural light and ventilation without the need for borrowed light from living areas.

Typical Nightingale plan. Image © Breathe Architecture

The model places an equal emphasis on financial return, sustainability and livability where others are more geared, in terms of development priorities, towards greater financial reward with far less concern for sustainability and livability. It also reduces project costs significantly as a result of streamlining both the sales process and apartment designs. This is achieved via the following exclusions:

  • No Marketing Team or Advertising Fees - Saving approximately $50,000
  • No Display Suite - Saving approximately $100,000
  • No Real Estate Agents - Saving approximately $250,000
  • No Basement Car Parking - Saving approximately $500,000
  • No Second Bathrooms - Saving approximately $200,000
  • No Individual Laundries - Saving approximately $150,000
  • No Individual Services - Saving approximately $250,000

And unlike a standard procurement process where the project is put out to tender, the intent is for projects which follow The Commons and Nightingale model to be built by a quality builder procured through a negotiated price as per the cost plan prepared by the Quantity Surveyor. This in turn allows for early input from the builder regarding buildability issues or equivalent problems that may arise during construction.

The ultimate goal with these projects according to James Legge, is to develop an affordable housing template that other architects with similar aspirations and goals can then use to facilitate similar outcomes. The release of the intellectual property is intended to empower "Architectural activism via architect as ethical developer."

The development team headed by Six Degrees Architects is currently taking registrations for Nightingale 2.0.

Incidentally the next MUDM event will be held on Thursday the 28th of May with guest presenter, acting Victorian Government Architect Jill Garner. To stay up to date or connect with MUDM, you can follow them on Twitter or on their Meetup page.


chris's picture

NOW PEOPLE!!!, though this is a tasteful design, no doubt, but this is a great example of how Architects use "nature Band-Aids" on their buildings to dup us to believe that this is a "really environmentally fulfilling building. This is not the only building with trees being thrown at it and to try and trick us to believe that it is what its function is supposed to be. I have no doubt that this is an environmentally excellent building, trust me on that, but for Architects to masterfully use plants to veneer a building is a just a quick fix to the eyes and it really is just an overused practise of making a building speak " we are an environmentally sound builing". It feels like this behaviour of throwing plants on a building is just another masterful trick, haven’t they thought of anything more advancing than this quick fix? Agree? Any who, good on ya Breathe Architecture and how you doin? What a mess.

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture

You've said trust me a few time in your comments...I don't think I would.

Do your research before lecturing everyone.

Back to top
chris's picture

I beg your pardon. Firstly to make a comment with no regards to the material above is a low blow, so you came here to smash other people down of their opinions and runaway is just pathetic. And sir, what does me doing research got to do with my opinion about an article, so before YOU start to lecture me on what to say, you should think about what you vomit onto this comment page, that is not on! So be careful with the hypocrisy you swirl, because your hating lashes to other people is demeaning and really low brow. Haters be hating.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Chris, you really picked the wrong building to try and make the old point about architects using vines to cover up their mistakes.

Back to top

Note: Every effort is made to ensure accurate information is provided. If information is out of date, or factually incorrect, please get it touch so we can rectify. Urban accepts no liability and responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient through relying on anything contained or omitted from our publication and platform. Opinions expressed by writers are that of the writer, and may not reflect that of Urban.