<html><body>
Despite extending the $15,000 first-home owners grant on new homes to January 1 2016, the NSW 2013-14 budget has left first-home buyers out in the cold with the failure to reintroduce the grant for existing properties.

<a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/new-south-wales/nsw-home-buyer-grants-tempting-40-plus-of-first-timers-in-emerging-shift-away-from-established-homes/2013061862376">The budget</a> was an opportunity for the NSW Government to reinvigorate the property market with a reduction in stamp duty rates and the reinstatement of first-home buyer incentives on existing properties.

They have failed.

We are very disappointed NSW first-home buyers continue to be disadvantaged by the decision not to reinstate the first-home owners grant for existing properties.

We are not satisfied with the grants being limited to new properties and neither are first-home buyers, who instead of purchasing new properties are choosing to purchase no property at all.

The most recent data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics clearly shows the first-home buyer market is in crisis.

The number of first-home buyer commitments as a percentage of total owner occupied housing finance commitments was 14.3% in April 2013.

The percentage of first-home buyers in the marketplace is getting very close to the record low of 12.5% in March 2004 and is well off the all-time high of 29.5% recorded in May 2009.

It is very disappointing that the government has not recognised the failure of this policy and amended its policy to include existing properties.

Many first-home buyers are not interested in purchasing new properties. The scheme introduced last year has failed to date because it assumes that supply is being hindered by demand from first-home buyers for existing properties.
It implies that by redirecting first-home buyers to new properties it will solve the supply problem. The truth is, supply is hindered not by first-home buyer demand but by a convoluted, inefficient planning system and a tax system that is overly dependent on property.

It is time for the government to recognise the critical role first-home buyers play in the property market and implement what really needs to be done to help them – reinstate the first-home buyers scheme for existing properties.

The first-home owner grant was due to be reduced to $10,000 on January 1 2014 and will now remain at $15,000 until January 1 2016.

Tim McKibbin is chief executive of the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.reinsw.com.au/">Real Estate Institute of New South Wales</a>.
</body></html>

tmckibbin-Ka7z9tGVMY

NSW budget ignores the needs of FHBs chasing existing properties: Tim McKibbin

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVATION
Reforms to Stamp Duty announced by the NSW Government are an insult to those people trying to purchase a home in NSW.
The Treasurer’s statement on November 5 provides no genuine relief to home buyers, it’s nothing more than hype and bluster in the lead up to the election, according to Real Estate Institute of NSW.
The State Government’s intention to index Stamp Duty by reference to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) starting from 1 July 2019 without adjusting the tax brackets is a real sleight of hand.
NSW Treasurer Dominic Perrottet has acknowledged that the stamp duty rates have not been amended since they were introduced in 1986 and then says that he is going to apply indexation (CPI) to the set of tax brackets that are 32 years out of date!
In 1986 the Sydney median house price was $93,576 and the median unit price was $86,109. At that time the overwhelming amount of property transactions did not attract the higher rates of tax.
Now with the Sydney median house price at $956,000 and the median unit price at $730,000 the overwhelming amount of transactions do attract the higher rates of tax.
By sitting on their hands for 32 years successive Governments have unconscionably profited at the expense of the home buyers including the most vulnerable - first home buyers.
The first tax bracket tops out at, $14,000. I ask rhetorically when was the last time you heard of someone buying a house for $14,000?
Yes, indexing is good, and the Treasury says had it been introduced 15 years ago then it would be better now - I agree. In fact if it had of been done 32 years ago it would be even better and deliver a far more equitable outcome for the property consumer (see table below).
If the Government is serious about Stamp Duty reform it must adjust the brackets to reflect today’s median house price and then index it from there
To do anything other than that is delivering reform without substance and is just disingenuous political grandstanding.
The Government’s own published data sets out clearly the continuing decline in property transactions and consequential Stamp Duty revenue.
The irony? There is empirical evidence demonstrating that a reduction in the rate of tax will drive more additional transactions and consequently more revenue for Government.
Stamp Duty brackets - what they are and what they should be
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2018/11/12/REINSW%20table.JPG" alt="">
Tim McKibbin is the REINSW CEO 
</body></html>

Tim McKibbin

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News